Please help with Legendre problem.

  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Legendre
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294

Homework Statement



Determine the IVP has bounded solution:
Legendre equation:
(1-x^2)y''-2xy'+6y=0 ; y(0)=0, y'(0)=1

Homework Equations



P_2 (x)=\frac{1}{2}[3x^2 -1]

Q_2 (x)=P_2 (x)\int \frac{dx}{[P_2 (x)]^2 (1-x^2)}

y'(x)=c_1 P'_2 (x) + c_2 {P'_2(x)\int \frac{dx}{[P_2 (x)]^2 (1-x^2)}+c_2 P_2 (x)\frac{1}{[P_2 (x)]^2 (1-x^2)}}


The Attempt at a Solution



n(n+1)=6 give n=2

General solution is y(x)=c_1 P_n (x)+c_2 Q_n (x)

P_2 (x)=\frac{1}{2}[3x^2 -1]\Rightarrow P_2 (0)=1

y(0)=0 \Rightarrow c_1 = 0 \Rightarrow y(x)=c_2 Q_2 (x) only.

P'_2 (x)=6x therefore

y'(x)=c_2 {P'_2(x)\int \frac{dx}{[P_2 (x)]^2 (1-x^2)}+P_2 (x)\frac{1}{[P_2 (x)]^2 (1-x^2)}}

y'(x)=c_2 [6x\int\frac{dx}{(3x^2 -1)^2 (1-x^2)}+(3x^2 -1)\frac{1}{(3x^2 -1)^2 (1-x^2)}]

x=0, the first part of y'(x)=0 because anything multiply by 6x equal zero. Therefore:

For x=0, y'(x)=c_2 [\frac{1}{(3x^2 -1)(1-x^2)}]

y'(0)=-c_2


Therefor there is a bounded solution for the problem.

The answer from the book was Q_2 is unbounded on (-1,1) therefore the Legendre differential equation has no bounded solution from the given boundary condition.
What did I do wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone please?
 
The book meant bounded over the interval when it asked for a bounded solution.
 
What's so special about x=0?
 
Because the boundary condition given y(0)=0 and y'(0)=1

I claim Q_2 (0) is bounded. There is a bounded solution at x=0.

I am still not quite sure about the bound or unbound of Q really means.
 
Last edited:
The solution to a differential equation is a function, not the function evaluated at some point.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top