Please help with PHYS-1 Problem Forces/Static/Equilibrium

  • Thread starter Thread starter StudyBuddy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
A gymnast weighing 56.5 kg stands on a 5.00 m balance beam with a mass of 250 kg, supported at two points. The forces acting on the beam include the gravitational force of the beam and the gymnast, as well as the reaction forces from the supports. The equilibrium equations derived indicate that the sum of the forces and torques must equal zero. There was a discussion about the correct setup of the equations, with emphasis on defining forces based on their expected directions. The importance of drawing a force diagram and using consistent signs in calculations was highlighted for clarity.
StudyBuddy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A gymnast with mass 56.5 kg stands on the end of a uniform balance beam as shown in the figure below. The beam is 5.00 m long and has a mass of 250 kg (excluding the mass of the two supports). Each support is 0.530 m from its end of the beam. In unit-vector notation, what are the forces on the beam due to support 1 and support 2?
12-p-076.gif


Homework Equations


F=ma
Torque=I*alpha

and where there is no acceleration, the sums are equal to 0.

Setting up the forces as the following:
F1 = support 1
F2 = support 2
F3 = gravitational force in center of beam
F4 = force of the gymnast at the end

I used Newton 2 for the sum of the forces in equilibrium (acceleration = 0)...
F1+F2+F3+F4=ma=0 where F3 = (250kg*g), F4=(56.5kg*g)
F1+F2+306.5g=0
1.) F2=-F1-306.5g
Then Newton II for sum of the torques... Where L is the length of the beam, and point I will rotate is located at the point where the gymnast is, so I can simplify the calculations.

2.)F1*4.47m +F3*2.5m+F2*0.053m=0

Next, I plugged 1( solved F2) into (2)

Simplifying, I get F1=1150.52N
Please help, and thank you in advance for you time and generosity.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For one, your work indicates that the support posts are positioned L/6 from the ends, but that isn't what is given in the problem. But it looks like your set up of the problem is good. I just think you made some errors in working through your equations. Based on the geometry of the problem, F1 is going to be less than F2. So yeah, your 2588 N for F1 is going to be too high.
 
  • Like
Likes StudyBuddy
What're you doing here?

I used Newton 2 for the sum of the forces in equilibrium (acceleration = 0)...
F1+F2+F3+F4=ma=0 where F3 = (250kg*g), F4=(56.5kg*g)
F1+F2+306.5g=0

...

You're writing it in terms of g? Why're all the signs positive? Did you draw a force diagram?
 
  • Like
Likes StudyBuddy
I finally figured it out...
 
Yes, I just implicated g= -9.8m/s^2
Thank you both for your replies
 
Student100 said:
You're writing it in terms of g? Why're all the signs positive? Did you draw a force diagram?

Yeah, I was going to comment on that also. I prefer to define the forces in the direction that I know (or think) they will be in reality. In this problem, you can know ahead of time, based on the geometry, the direction of all of the forces. So I would have written F1 + F2 = F3 + F4.

Also, when I do torque calculations, rather than summing all of the forces to equal 0, it is easier for me to do CW = CCW, based on the direction that I defined all of the forces. But that is just my personal preference. I just like positive numbers better than negative numbers. :)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top