Point charges and potential electric energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the separation distance required for two point charges, q_1 and q_2, to achieve a specific electric potential energy of -110 J. The original poster struggles with understanding the relevant equations and concepts, particularly distinguishing between electric potential and potential energy. They initially attempted to apply Coulomb's Law and the work-energy principle but ended up confused about the relationship between force, distance, and energy. A response emphasizes the importance of reviewing the textbook section on potential energy and clarifies that work is only equal to force times distance under constant force conditions. The conversation highlights common misconceptions in physics, particularly regarding the definitions and applications of electric potential and potential energy.
Torquescrew
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
This is probably child's play for most of you, but a guy like me struggles to understand basic concepts. A kick in the pants to set me off in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.

Homework Statement


How far must the point charges q_1 = 7.60 microCoulombs and q_2 = -24.0 microCoulombs be separated for the electric potential energy of the system to be -110 J?


Homework Equations


E=F/q
F=k(q1*q2)/(r^2)
k=8.988810^9 (Nm^2)/(C^2)
Volt = N/C
W=Fr
r= distance in this case


The Attempt at a Solution


Honestly, I'm not quite sure where to start. Not sure which formula I'm supposed to use. I gave it a try anyway, though. Coulomb's Law seems perfectly reasonable until I realize that I don't have a value for distance. All the same, I multiplied 8.988E9 by 7.6E-6 and 24E-6 and assumed my force would equal 1.63941r^2 N.
Then, since work is measured in joules and so is potential energy, I tried to use the formula W=Force x distance (and I still don't know the distance), giving me something like 1.63941r^3 Joules.
And if I wasn't already lost, I notice that electric potential is supposed to be measured in volts. But since the question doesn't ask for volts, all that's left is for me to solve for r.
I try to solve for r by means of 1.63941r3=110, which gives me 4.06 (4.1) meters.
Since the question wants the answer in cm, I used 4.1x10^2 cm.

Obviously, I got the answer wrong.
It's no surprise, seeing as how I'm just sort of drowning in a vast ocean of numbers.

Can I get a metaphorical life preserver?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
None of the equations that you have listed are related to potential energy. Look in the chapter/section of your textbook that talks about potential energy and read carefully what is said. Then try again.

Other misconceptions that you have

1. Work is equal to force*distance only if the force does not change as the distance changes. This is not the case here.

2. Electric potential (measured in Volts) is usually represented by the symbol V and is not the same as potential energy (measured in Joules) that is usually represented by the symbol U.
 
Actually, that was probably the best advice I could have got. Silly as it sounds, I managed to completely overlook that formula as I was writing my lecture notes.
Thanks for the advice.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top