Point me in the right direction

  • Thread starter Thread starter jpnnngtn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Point
AI Thread Summary
A storm cloud has a potential difference of 1.00 X 10^8 V, transferring 50.0 C of charge during a lightning storm, with 1.00% of the energy absorbed by a tree. The energy increase is calculated as 50 X 10^8 Joules, and the specific heat of water is noted as 4186 J/kg°C. To raise the temperature of water from 30°C to 100°C and then vaporize it requires a total of 25.4 X 10^5*M Joules. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding energy calculations and the relevance of temperature in the context of the problem. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of energy transfer and thermodynamics in this scenario.
jpnnngtn
Here's the problem:

A certain storm cloud has a potential difference of 1.00 X 10^8 V relative to a tree. If, during a lightning storm, 50.0 C of charge is transferred through this potential difference and 1.00% of the energy is absorbed by the tree, how much water (sap in the tree) initially at 30 degrees Celsius can be boiled away? Water has a specific heat of 4186 j /kg * degrees Celsius. It has a boiling point of 100 degrees Celsius, and a heat of vaporization of 2.26 X 10^6 J /kg


I know that this problem has to do with Energy stored in a capacitor.

Potential Difference = 1.00 X 10^8


C = e(o)(A / d) "I don't have an area or a distance so that wouldn't matter"

I think what is throwing me off is the temperature included in this problem, for that matter, everything involving the water.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by jpnnngtn
Here's the problem:

A certain storm cloud has a potential difference of 1.00 X 10^8 V relative to a tree. If, during a lightning storm, 50.0 C of charge is transferred through this potential difference and 1.00% of the energy is absorbed by the tree, how much water (sap in the tree) initially at 30 degrees Celsius can be boiled away? Water has a specific heat of 4186 j /kg * degrees Celsius. It has a boiling point of 100 degrees Celsius, and a heat of vaporization of 2.26 X 10^6 J /kg


I know that this problem has to do with Energy stored in a capacitor.

Potential Difference = 1.00 X 10^8


C = e(o)(A / d) "I don't have an area or a distance so that wouldn't matter"

I think what is throwing me off is the temperature included in this problem, for that matter, everything involving the water.

I don't think it is the temperature so much as the "area-distance" problem. It's interesting that you give a formula that involves area and distance and then say "I don't have an area or a distance so that wouldn't matter"! What you really mean is that that formula is irrelevant.

The crucial point is that a "volt" is a measure of potential difference per coulomb. Since you are told that the lightning had a voltage of 1.00 X 10^8 V and the tree was hit by 50 Coulombs, there was an energy increase of 50 X 10^8 Joules.

Now, use the temperature information.

You know that the specific heat of water is 4186 j /kg * degrees Celsius so it takes 70* 4186= 293020 J to raise each kg of water from 30 to 100 degrees C. That is, if the mass of water is M, The energy required to raise it to 100 degrees C is 293020*M Joules which is
2.93 X 10^5*M Joules (3 significant figures since heat of vaporization is only given to 3 significant figures).
You also know that the "heat of vaporization" for water is 2.26 X 10^6 J /kg so the amount of energy necessary to vaporize M kg. of water is 2.25 X 10^6 *M= 22.5 X 10^5 *M Joules.

To raise M kg of water from 30 degrees to 100 degrees and then vaporize it requires: 2.93 X 10^5*M+ 22.5 X 10^5*M =
25.4 X 10^5*M Joules. Since you know the total Joules available is
50 X 10^8 Joules. Solve for M.
 
Remember that electrical energy equals Vq

You know V and you know q

solve for EPE

find one percent of this

Look in a first semester physics book to find equations you can plug into solve for the rest.
 
And this is college level? During which year of college do you touch QFT, QED, QCD, Group Theory or Representations?
 
It depends on what college it is...because they learn many different things...not necessarily at the highest level...
I saw a paper about artificial neural nets for students who were studying something completely different...
 
This is much to juicy to discuss here. I'll open a thread about what classes does each of us take.

P.S. It's funny to see two romanians talking in english.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top