Point of Reference for Conservation of Angular Momentum

AI Thread Summary
When analyzing angular momentum conservation, the point of reference (p.o.r.) used must remain consistent if the total linear momentum is non-zero. Angular momentum can be conserved with respect to one reference point while not conserved with another if the total force acting on the system is non-zero. Conversely, if the total linear momentum is zero, angular momentum becomes independent of the chosen reference point. Similarly, if the total force is zero, the torque is also independent of the reference point. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately applying conservation laws in physics.
angelatan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
When analyzing the conservation of angular momentum of a particular system, should we use the same p.o.r. before and after or can we use different p.o.r.'s? As far as I know, we should always use the same reference, but sometimes I see several solutions that use different references in my textbook.

Thank you for your help, and pardon my awkward English
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to use the same point of reference if the total linear momentum is non-zero. In the same fashion, angular momentum can be preserved with respect to one reference point while not being conserved with respect to another if the total force is non-zero.

If the total linear momentum is zero, the angular momentum is independent of the reference point. If the total force is zero, the torque is independent of the reference point.
 
  • Like
Likes Quantum Aravinth
Orodruin said:
You need to use the same point of reference if the total linear momentum is non-zero. In the same fashion, angular momentum can be preserved with respect to one reference point while not being conserved with respect to another if the total force is non-zero.

If the total linear momentum is zero, the angular momentum is independent of the reference point. If the total force is zero, the torque is independent of the reference point.

Can you please explain it further?
 
Quantum Aravinth said:
Can you please explain it further?
Not unless you point out what parts you have problems with.
 
Orodruin said:
Not unless you point out what parts you have problems with.

I was entirely confused,
Can you please explain it with a simple system? Be it any system
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top