Point Where Electric Field=0 (3 point charges on x-axis)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a point on the positive x-axis where the electric field is zero due to three point charges: -7 µC at x = -1.0 cm, 1.0 µC at x = 0, and +7 µC at x = +1.0 cm. The electric field equation is set up correctly, but there were initial difficulties in isolating x and solving the equation. After correcting a sign error, it was determined that a root exists between 0 and 1. The final approach involves simplifying the equation and focusing on the numerator to identify potential solutions.
lola748
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Point charges of -7 µC, 1.0 µC, and +7 µC are located along the x-axis at x = -1.0 cm, x = 0, and x = +1.0 cm, respectively. Locate a point on the positive x-axis where the magnitude of the electric field is zero.


Homework Equations


E=(kQ)/r^2
E(total)=E(1)+E(2)+E(3)

The Attempt at a Solution



I feel like I have the correct setup of the equation and just wanted to confirm:

E=0=-(7e-6/(x+1)^2)+(1e-6/(x^2))-(7e-6/(1-x)^2)

From this point I'm not really sure on how to proceed with solving for x.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to isolate the x, so you should multiply out the exponent and rearrange the problem in order to use the quadratic equation.

Edit: Actually don't isolate the x, just multiply the exponents out and group the similar exponents out.

Edit 2: Hmm, its not working for me, disregard post
 
Last edited:
Tip: When you're looking for zeros, you can discard all the common constants (same as setting your equation to zero and dividing both sides by the common constants). So your equation then looks like:

$$0 = \frac{-7}{(1 + x)^2} + \frac{1}{x^2} + \frac{-7}{(1 - x)^2}$$

Putting that over a common denominator and taking just the numerator yields a function that doesn't look promising for having positive real roots.

Edit: I take that back! I made a silly sign error on the last term (now fixed). There is a root betwixt 0 and 1.
 
Last edited:
Aaaaah I see, Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top