B Do probabilities for entangled polarization states add up to one?

klw289
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Two photons are moving in opposite directions along the y-axis are in the entangled polarization state
|Ψ> = (1/√2)(|VV>+|HH>)
V is vertical polarization relative to the z axis and measured from an axis n1 and is defined as θ=θ1 and H is horizontal polarization to the z axis measured from an axis n2 and is defined as θ=θ2.

Would PVV+PHH+PVH+PHV=1

If PVV is the probability that photon 1 givees vertical polarization relative to an axis n1 and photon 2 gives vertical polarization relative to an axis n2

Am I correct in saying this as there is no way to predict the outcome of a spin measurement and so those probabilities must add to one as they are all the options available and the choice of axis does not matter??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the state given your third and fourth terms must be zero.
 
Jilang said:
For the state given your third and fourth terms must be zero.
The detectors are not aligned with the vertical axis and not necessarily at the same angle, in OP's statement of the problem, so those two probabilities need not be zero.

It is correct that the sum of the four probabilities must add to unity - they are mutually exclusive and collectively cover all possible outcomes.
 
Ah yes I get it now. The V and H have morphed!
 
To say it very clearly, the assumed formula is correct. The state is properly normalized to 1, i.e., ##\langle \psi|\psi \rangle =\|\psi\|^2=1##. Since ##|VV \rangle##, ##|HH \rangle##, ##|HV \rangle##, and ##|VH \rangle## together build an orthonormal system, i.e.,
$$\langle ab|a'b' \rangle=\delta_{aa'} \delta_{b b'}, \quad \sum_{a,b} |a,b \rangle \langle b,a| =1,$$
you indeed have
$$\langle \psi|\psi \rangle=1=\sum_{ab} \langle \psi |ab \rangle \langle ab|\psi \rangle=\sum_{ab} |\psi_{ab}|^2 = \sum_{ab} P_{ab}.$$
As very often in quantum theory, you can derive a lot from clever insertions of decompositions of the unit operator :-)).
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top