I Polarization in Rabi oscillations

Malamala
Messages
345
Reaction score
28
Hello! I have 2 levels, with quantum numbers ##(J=0,m_J=0)## and ##(J=1,m_J=1)## and I am a bit confused about whether I can drive Rabi oscillations between them with a fixed laser polarization. Assuming I start in the ##(J=0,m_J=0)##, I would need right-circularly polarized light to drive that transition, however once the electron gets to the ##(J=1,m_J=1)## (basically after a ##\pi##-pulse), will the electron come back to the initial state if I keep applying the right-circularly polarized light? Given that this situation is equivalent to starting in ##(J=1,m_J=1)##, I would need a left-circularly polarized light to drive this transition. So will the electron just stay in ##(J=1,m_J=1)## forever (ignoring other states and lifetimes) unless I change the polarization? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Malamala said:
So will the electron just stay in (J=1,mJ=1) forever (ignoring other states and lifetimes) unless I change the polarization?
Yep. If you ignore spontaneous emission (and other states), then the atom will stay in the J=0, mJ=0 state forever.
 
Twigg said:
Yep. If you ignore spontaneous emission (and other states), then the atom will stay in the J=0, mJ=0 state forever.
Thank you! I assume you meant ##J=1, m_J=1##, right? So the only way to get Rabi oscillations (in an ideal 2 levels system) is to use a linearly polarized light, such that the transition can happen both ways?
 
Malamala said:
Hello! I have 2 levels, with quantum numbers ##(J=0,m_J=0)## and ##(J=1,m_J=1)## and I am a bit confused about whether I can drive Rabi oscillations between them with a fixed laser polarization. Assuming I start in the ##(J=0,m_J=0)##, I would need right-circularly polarized light to drive that transition, however once the electron gets to the ##(J=1,m_J=1)## (basically after a ##\pi##-pulse), will the electron come back to the initial state if I keep applying the right-circularly polarized light? Given that this situation is equivalent to starting in ##(J=1,m_J=1)##, I would need a left-circularly polarized light to drive this transition. So will the electron just stay in ##(J=1,m_J=1)## forever (ignoring other states and lifetimes) unless I change the polarization? Thank you!
No, it a single polarization of light that couples the two states. the ##(J=1,m_J=1) \rightarrow (J=0,m_J=0)## transition is stimulated emission, not absorption.
 
DrClaude said:
No, it a single polarization of light that couples the two states. the ##(J=1,m_J=1) \rightarrow (J=0,m_J=0)## transition is stimulated emission, not absorption.
But my question is about Rabi oscillations. Don't Rabi oscillations involve both stimulated transition and absorption? As far as I can see, to go from ##(J=0,m_J=0)## to ##(J=1,m_J=1)## you need the opposite polarization relative to going from ##(J=1,m_J=1)## to ##(J=0,m_J=0)##. So it seems like you can't have a full, ##2\pi## Rabi oscillation between these 2 levels if your polarization is either left or right handed, as you'd get stuck in one of the 2 levels after a ##\pi## pulse.
 
##\Delta m= +1## on absorption requires ##\sigma^+## light while ##\Delta m= -1## on emission is ##\sigma^+## light. It is the same polarization in both cases.

By the way, you should talk about ##\sigma^+## and ##\sigma^-## polarizations, not left and right handed, as the latter depend on the direction of propagation of the light.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top