Can the Quantization Axis of an Atom Affect its Spectral Emission?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of changing the quantization axis of an atom on its spectral emission, particularly in the context of transitions driven by linearly polarized light and the influence of an applied magnetic field. Participants explore theoretical modeling approaches and the implications of Zeeman splitting on the emission spectrum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario involving an atom with specific angular momentum levels and questions the effects of rotating the magnetic field on spectral emissions.
  • Another participant suggests that decomposing linearly polarized light into circularly polarized components could drive different transitions, leading to Zeeman broadening.
  • There is a query about the necessity of using a density matrix to find the emission spectrum for each transition.
  • A later reply confirms the initial reasoning about the transitions and notes that strong magnetic fields should result in observable lines corresponding to specific magnetic sublevels, while stating that the m'=0 transition is forbidden.
  • Participants discuss the use of optical Bloch equations to model the Zeeman-split spectra and express uncertainty about deriving the spectrum from these equations.
  • It is proposed that the absorption from different atoms should be treated as incoherent, suggesting that spectra for different transitions can be summed to obtain the overall emission spectrum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the correctness of the initial reasoning regarding the transitions and the effects of the magnetic field. However, there remains uncertainty about the specific modeling techniques and the application of the optical Bloch equations, indicating that the discussion is not fully resolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of confidence in their reasoning and modeling approaches, with some uncertainty regarding the application of the density matrix and the derivation of spectra from the optical Bloch equations.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

Please see the attached picture. It shows an atom, the filled black circle, which consists of a J=0 level (with m=0 sublevel) and J'=1 (with m' = +/- 1 sublevels). From the left is a nearly monochromatic laser impinging on the atom, which is linearly polarized along the same direction of the applied B-field. This situation will drive the Δm=0 transition, thus displaying a Lorentzian spectrum with FWHM given by the lifetime of the excited state (as a function of frequency).

My question is, what will happen if the direction of the B-field is changed with 90 degrees, i.e. it is now parallel with k? This of course changes the quantization axis.

My own suggestion is that I can always decompose the incoming linearly polarized light into two circularly polarized components of opposite helicity that drive the Δm = +/-1 transitions. But they will - contrary to the first situation - be Zeeman broadened.

1) Is my reasoning correct?
2) Say I want to model the spectrum numerically using a collection of atoms. Would it simply just be to take the spectrum for the Δm=-1 transition and add it to the spectrum for the Δm=+1 transition?

Thanks for the help in advance.


Niles.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Do I have to use the density matrix to find the emission spectrum for each transition?
 
OK, I have thought this over. First of all, I know my suggestion in the first post is correct. So the answer to question 1 is "yes".

Now comes the task of question 2, namely to find the Zeeman-splitted spectrums for the different transitions (p- and s-polarized light). I am thinking about using the optical Bloch equations, but I am not quite sure how to get the spectrum from these.

Have anybody done something similar before?
 
1) yes, you are correct. Actually, if the magnetic field is strong enough you should see 2 lines corresponding to m'=-1,1. To the best of my knowledge the m'=0 transition is forbidden in this case.

2) The absorption of different atoms should be incoherent, i.e. you just sum over the spectra of the different atoms.

One way of looking at the Maxwell-Bloch equations is to find the equilibrium densities as function of detuning.

You should be able to work out the emitted intensity as function of detuning from the population of the excited state and the time constant of the exponential decay. I would just calculate the spectra for m'=+ and -, and then sum them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K