Polarization of light through a sugar solution

KaiserBrandon
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A glass vessel is placed between a pair of crossed HN-50 linear polarizers, and 50% of the natural light incident on the first polarizer is transmitted through the second polarizer. By how much did the sugar solution in the cell rotate the light passed by the first polarizer.


Homework Equations


I(\vartheta)=I(0)cos^{2}(\vartheta)
where \vartheta is the angle between the transmission axes of the polarizers, and I(0) is the irradience incident on the analyzer.


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having a very hard time understanding how HN polarizers work, but here is my stab at the question:
An HN-50 polarizer transmits 50% of natural light incident on it. So If the natural light incident through the first polarizer is I, then I(0)=0.5I. So:
I(\vartheta)=0.5I*cos^{2}(90+\varphi)=0.5I
the 90 is in the cos because the polarizers are crossed, and I'm assuming that means their transmission angles are perpindicular. and \varphi is the angle that the sugar rotates the light. So, \varphi=-90.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you misunderstood the question. The way I understand it, 50% is the ratio between the intensity of incident light on 1st polarizer & the intensity of light coming out of 2nd polarizer. Both polarizers have the same polarization axis. That is, if there were no sugar solution in between, the light coming out would have the same intensity as incident light. But thanks to the sugar solution which rotates the polarization plane of the beam by some angle, the light coming out has different intensity.
From here, you can work it out, can't you? :wink:
 
too late, already turned in the assignment. However, I'm pretty sure the light incident on the first polaraizer would be 50% transmitted (since the incident light is natural light with no specific polarization). Without the sugar, no light would go through the polarizer since their axes are crossed (at right angles to each other). So the sugar rotates it 90 degrees so that the light incident on the second polarizer has a polarization parallel to it's axis, and so gets transmitted through completely (so 50% the intensity of the natural light ends up at the end).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top