Polarizers in series, I got the correct answer, want to verify why

  • Thread starter Thread starter breakingaway
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the orientation of the third polarizer in a series of three, given an unpolarized laser beam and its power transmission through the polarizers. The user correctly applies the formula for power transmission through polarizers, confirming that the exponent for the transmission factor corresponds to the number of identical polarizers. Clarification is sought on the angle adjustments in the cosine function, particularly how the angle of the previous polarizer affects the calculation for the subsequent one. The user proposes a scenario with an additional polarizer and seeks confirmation on the angle adjustments needed for accurate calculations. The conversation emphasizes understanding the relationship between polarizer orientation and power transmission.
breakingaway
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ax98wBd.png

An unpolarized laser emits 1.00 W of continuous optical power.
It's beam is directed into three identical linear polarizers, each with a maximum transmission of 95.0%. The first polarizer has its transmission axis vertical, the second at 45.0 from the vertical, and the third is in an unknown orientation. An optical power meter reads the overall power transmitted as 5.50 milliwatts. Find the orientation of the third polarizer's transmission axis relative to the vertical. (20 points)



Homework Equations



I = Imax*1/2 * cos212)

The Attempt at a Solution



So I set up the equation as such:
5.5*10-3= (0.95)3*1.0W*1/2 * cos2(90°-45°)*cos2(θ - 45°)

I do some algebra and get θ = 125.78, which is the correct answer.

What I'm looking to clarify is a few things.

For the (0.95)3 part of the equation, the exponent will always just be the number of polarisers if they all have the same maximum transmission?

cos2(θ - 45°), the -45° comes from the previous polariser right? So if there was another polariser that had an angle 60° from the vertical place before the last unknown polariser, the equation would change to:
5.5*10-3= (0.95)4*1.0W*1/2 * cos2(45°)*cos2(60°-45°)*cos2(θ - (60°-45°))

Is this correct? I'm not 100% certain and I don't have access to any more problems in the same form as this one that I have the answer to.

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
breakingaway said:
For the (0.95)3 part of the equation, the exponent will always just be the number of polarisers if they all have the same maximum transmission?

cos2(θ - 45°), the -45° comes from the previous polariser right?
Right
So if there was another polariser that had an angle 60° from the vertical place before the last unknown polariser, the equation would change to:
5.5*10-3= (0.95)4*1.0W*1/2 * cos2(45°)*cos2(60°-45°)*cos2(θ - (60°-45°))
I think the angles should be 45°, 15° (=60-45) and θ-60°, as θ is measured relative to the vertical axis.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
I was thinking using 2 purple mattress samples, and taping them together, I do want other ideas though, the main guidelines are; Must have a volume LESS than 1600 cubic centimeters, and CAN'T exceed 25 cm in ANY direction. Must be LESS than 1 kg. NO parachutes. NO glue or Tape can touch the egg. MUST be able to take egg out in less than 1 minute. Grade A large eggs will be used.
Back
Top