Polarizing filter not extinguish the wave although 90 degree polarizers

In summary, when a non-polarized electromagnetic wave crosses a polarizer filter, its intensity drops to half. If this now polarized wave crosses another polarizer at a 90 degree angle, the wave is completely vanished. However, if a third polarizer is added at a 45 degree angle, the wave can pass through all three polarizers without disappearing. This is a quantum mechanical phenomenon that is commonly demonstrated in high-school labs. The key is that a polarizing filter not only absorbs light, but also polarizes it in the direction of the filter. This can be explained using classical electrodynamics, but is also valid in quantum mechanics.
  • #1
Felipe Lincoln
Gold Member
99
11
When a non-polarized electromagnetic wave cross a polarizer filter, its intensity drops to a half. Then this now polarized wave cross a polarizer such that it has 90 degree compared to the other. The wave is completely vanished. But if we put another polarizer with, let's say 45 degree in comparison with the first, the wave pass through all the three polarized and is not vanished. Its intensity is ##\frac{1}{2}I_0\cos^245\cos^245 ##.
It seems that the tricky happened when the polarized wave let's with 0 degree from the vertical axis passes through the 45 degree polarizer it breaks into vertical and horizontal components, if it wasn't true the wave would disapear when crossing the last 90 degree polarizer (horizontal).
Why the wave doesn't disapear after adding the third polarizer in between the two perpendicular polarizers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This is a quantum mechanical phenomenon, and it's one of the neater demonstrations of how quantum mechanics is different from classical mechanics (it might be the only one that is routinely done in high-school labs).

The tricky thing you're looking for is that a polarizing filter does more than just absorbing some of the light; whatever passes the polarizer is also polarized in the direction of the filter. The light that leaves the first polarizer is vertically polarized, and none of it can pass through the horizontal filter (##cos^2(90)## is zero). But if it encounters a 45-degree polarizer on the way, half of it passes through (##cos^2(45)## is 1/2) and that surviving half is now polarized at 45 degrees. When this encounters the horizontal filter, the angle with the horizontal is 45 degrees, so half of it passes through.
 
  • Like
Likes Felipe Lincoln
  • #3
I would have thought that the OP is correct and that there is no need for the doubt that's written in the final paragraph as it's already been explained fine in classical terms. The OP doesn't mention photons.
Nugatory said:
This is a quantum mechanical phenomenon, and it's one of the neater demonstrations of how quantum mechanics is different from classical mechanics (it might be the only one that is routinely done in high-school labs).
Maybe that comment applies to some kinds of polariser but the same effect can be observed using a very classical wire grid and plane polarised microwaves. As far as I know, the way such a polariser works is explained using Maxwell's Equations. The wire polariser passes components of one polarisation and reflects the other components.
I agree that the quantum level explanation is somewhat harder to take on board but, as with many phenomena, one of the two approaches is often more convenient than the other. Interference and diffraction (both taught at a similar level in School) can also be approached from either direction but surprisingly (?) the resulting mathematical expressions are the the same.
 
  • Like
Likes Felipe Lincoln and Mentz114
  • #4
sophiecentaur said:
[]
Maybe that comment applies to some kinds of polariser but the same effect can be observed using a very classical wire grid and plane polarised microwaves. As far as I know, the way such a polariser works is explained using Maxwell's Equations. The wire polariser passes components of one polarisation and reflects the other components.
I agree that the quantum level explanation is somewhat harder to take on board but, as with many phenomena, one of the two approaches is often more convenient than the other. Interference and diffraction (both taught at a similar level in School) can also be approached from either direction but surprisingly (?) the resulting mathematical expressions are the the same.

That is interesting. I found this* which looks meaty.

*
http://www.hep.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/polarizer.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #5
It certainly is 'meaty' for one as out of touch as I am. The result of all that seems to agree with the notion that the transmitted wave is more or less linearly polarised normal to the wires. It's a pretty easy A level experiment to perform with basic microwave equipment and you get the 'right' answer.
 
  • Like
Likes Felipe Lincoln
  • #6
. . . . . . the phenomenon of polarisation rotation occurs all over the place in the RF world. Broadcasters go to a lot of trouble to arrange for nearby co-channel transmitters (all frequencies) to use orthogonal polarisations in order to help receiving antennae to select the wanted signal and reject the unwanted. Problem is that nearby metal structures (diagonal) can re-radiate components of the 'cross' polar wave and spoil the selectivity that's been aimed at.
 
  • #7
Nugatory said:
This is a quantum mechanical phenomenon, and it's one of the neater demonstrations of how quantum mechanics is different from classical mechanics (it might be the only one that is routinely done in high-school labs).
It's also perfectly valid within classical electrodynamics. It's of course true that it is valid in QED as well.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur

1. Why does a polarizing filter not completely extinguish the wave even when two 90 degree polarizers are used?

This is because polarizing filters do not block all of the light passing through them. They only filter out light waves that are polarized in a certain direction. When two 90 degree polarizers are used, some light that is polarized at a different angle may still pass through.

2. Can the angle of the polarizing filter affect the amount of light that passes through?

Yes, the angle of the polarizing filter can affect the amount of light that passes through. When the angle of the polarizer aligns with the polarization of the light waves, more light will pass through. However, if the angle is slightly off, less light will pass through.

3. Is it possible for a polarizing filter to completely block out all light waves?

No, it is not possible for a polarizing filter to completely block out all light waves. Some light waves will always be able to pass through, even when two 90 degree polarizers are used. This is because natural light is a combination of different polarizations.

4. What types of light waves are affected by polarizing filters?

Polarizing filters are most effective on light waves that are polarized in a specific direction, such as sunlight reflecting off of a flat surface. They are less effective on natural light, which is a combination of different polarizations.

5. Can polarizing filters be used to reduce glare on screens?

Yes, polarizing filters can be used to reduce glare on screens, such as computer monitors or phone screens. This is because the light waves reflecting off of the screen are polarized in a specific direction, and the polarizing filter can block out some of these waves to reduce glare.

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
43
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
563
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
926
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top