Pole Changing Method: Understanding the Confusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter ranju
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Pole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the confusion surrounding the pole changing methods and the interpretation of diagrams involving coils a1a1' and a2a2'. Participants clarify that the dot and cross symbols represent the direction of the magnetic field rather than the current, which is assumed to flow clockwise in both coils. There is a debate about the correct application of the right-hand rule and how it relates to the direction of the magnetic field in the context of the diagrams. The need to read the diagrams alongside the accompanying text is emphasized for better understanding. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of visualizing magnetic fields and current directions in electrical engineering concepts.
ranju
Messages
221
Reaction score
3
I was going through pole changing methods , when I was studying this given figure , I am quite confused in it.. in the text a1a1' & a2a2' are considered as 2 separate coils & it is assumed that both coils are carrying clockwise current , then what that "dot" & "cross" denoting?? Is it the magnetic field according to right hand thumb rule..?? But then why in a1' & a2' the direction is outwards.. as according to right hand rule it'll be inside the plane only ..!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20150423_092118.jpg
    IMG_20150423_092118.jpg
    36.6 KB · Views: 477
  • IMG_20150423_092239.jpg
    IMG_20150423_092239.jpg
    32.5 KB · Views: 439
Engineering news on Phys.org
You should read the diagrams in the context of the accompanying text. What does it say?

I think you'll find that a2 and a2' are two parts of the same loop of wire. The dot and cross indicate the direction of the current in the wire.
But I cannot see the circulation arrows properly to verify.
 
In the context it is assumed that current is circulating in clockwise direction in both the coils a1a1' & a2a2' . dot & cross can't denote current then , it must be the field.>!
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top