Population Ecology Homework: Solving for N After Year One

  • Thread starter Thread starter Youngster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ecology population
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the future population size of Kolea birds after being displaced to a new island. The initial population is 10 birds, with an intrinsic growth rate of 1.8 per year and a carrying capacity of 2,000 birds for similar habitats. The user is able to compute the first year's values but struggles to determine the population size for subsequent years, indicating that it likely depends on the carrying capacity (K). The calculations involve using parameters such as the logistical correction and per capita growth rate. Understanding these factors is crucial for predicting the population dynamics over time.
Youngster
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A flock of 10 Kolea birds going back to its mating grounds in Alaska from Hawaii gets blown off course and lands on a small island in the Aleutian (with no other Kolea birds) that is 25 km2 and has tundra habitat. The birds are known to have an intrinsic growth rate of 1.8 per year. Islands of similar size and climate have a carrying capacity of 2,000 Kolea birds, as the birds do have some territoriality. Make a table with the following parameters assuming that these birds have founded a new population will return here year after year.:

- Population Size (N)
- Intrinsic Growth Rate (r)
- Logistical Correction (\frac{K-N}{K})
- Per Capita Growth Rate (r\frac{K-N}{K})
- Population Growth Rate (rN\frac{K-N}{K})

Homework Equations



Given above in parameters

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't have any issues plugging in values to fill out the first year, but I don't know how one determines the population size (N) of the following years. In this case, I'm stuck at year two and have no idea what the population should be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on what "K" is, I suspect it's the carrying capacity.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top