Pore dilation with increased pressure

AI Thread Summary
When walking on wet sand, the pressure from your weight causes the sand to dilate, pulling water from the surface into the pores rather than making the surrounding area wetter. This phenomenon occurs because, unlike other soils, beach sand grains interlock and leverage apart instead of compressing under pressure. The result is a temporary drying effect around your feet as water is drawn away. This understanding challenges the common intuition that pressure should push water outward. The mechanics of soil behavior significantly influence the experience of walking on the beach.
A_B
Messages
87
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


When walking on the wet strip on the beach, you notice the sand around your feet becoming dry for a while. Why is this?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Intuition says that the pressure due to your weight should squeeze the water from under your foot to the surrounding sand, making it more wet, instead, water is pulled away from the sand surrounding your feet.

I found the following in the soil mechanics page on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil_mechanics"
"Foot pressing in soil causes soil to dilate, drawing water from the surface into the pores."

As I understand it, this says that by pushing on wet sand, its volume increases, since the pores dilate, How does that work?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
A_B said:
Intuition says that the pressure due to your weight should squeeze the water from under your foot to the surrounding sand, making it more wet, instead, water is pulled away from the sand surrounding your feet.

I found the following in the soil mechanics page on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil_mechanics"
"Foot pressing in soil causes soil to dilate, drawing water from the surface into the pores."

As I understand it, this says that by pushing on wet sand, its volume increases, since the pores dilate, How does that work?

That's really interesting. I had always assumed the mechanism was was you intuited. The discussion of your quoted passage notes that soils can do that, but not beach sand. Looking a little further I found a discussion of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds%27_dilatancy" . That explains that when the grains are interlocking, they lever each other apart rather than compressing.

You have have forever changed my walks on the beach. Thanks for that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top