Portion problem including Vrms

  • Thread starter Thread starter brycenrg
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To increase the rms speed of gas molecules at 20.0°C by 2%, the temperature must be raised according to the relationship between rms speed and temperature. The equation shows that the ratio of the new rms speed to the original is 1.02, leading to the conclusion that the new temperature can be calculated using the proportionality of rms speed to the square root of temperature. The solution manual derives the new temperature by squaring the ratio and applying it to the initial temperature. Understanding that the constants in the equation remain unchanged allows for the determination of the new temperature based on the increased rms speed. This highlights the direct relationship between molecular speed and temperature in Kelvin.
brycenrg
Messages
95
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The rms speed of molecules in a gas at 20.0C is to be increased by 2 percent. To what temperature must it be raised?

Homework Equations


Vrms = Squareroot((3kt)/m)

The Attempt at a Solution


vrms.02 + vrms = squareroot((3kt)/m)
vrms(1.02) = squareroot((3kt)/m)

Too many unknowns.

In the solution manual it does
(vrms1/vrms2) = 1.02 = (squareroot t1)/(squareroot t2)
t2 1.02^2 = t1 then plug in 20 plus 275 for t2 to get t1

My miss understanding is how does the solution manual know its 1.02 as a portion?
They use proportionality or something. I can't see the logical steps.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brycenrg said:
vrms.02 + vrms = squareroot((3kt)/m)
You should have two equations here, one relating the unincreased vrms to the unraised temperature, and one relating the increased vrms to the new temperature.
 
brycenrg said:
vrms(1.02) = squareroot((3kt)/m)

Too many unknowns.
Once you've written an equation for each of the two different cases, in both of these equations the k and m have unchanged values for your gas sample (even though you may not know those values).
 
Equating k.e. to molecular temperature energy we get
mv2/2 = 3kT/2 (kT/2 in each of the three directions)
So we see that v2 ∝ T
and so vRMS ∝ √T.
Of course T is in Kelvin.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top