Positronium Decay: Find Momentum of Gamma Rays

  • Thread starter Thread starter Newtime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the momentum of gamma rays resulting from positronium decay, specifically showing that it equals m_0c, where m_0 is the electron mass. The participant expresses uncertainty about whether to apply conservation of energy, momentum, or both, and questions the relevance of provided equations. They attempt to use conservation of momentum but realize they mistakenly include velocity (v) instead of the speed of light (c) in their calculations. Clarification is sought on the correct approach to derive the momentum of each gamma ray. The conversation highlights the challenges faced by individuals transitioning from mathematics to physics, particularly in understanding energy considerations.
Newtime
Messages
347
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider positronium decay. Show the magnitude of the momentum for each gamma ray is m_0c where m_0 is the mass of the electron.

Homework Equations



E=\sqrt{p^2c^2+m^2c^4}, p=h\nu/v

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to start this one, though I suspect the solution is elementary. Should I use conservation of energy or momentum or both? Are the above equations relevant? I come from a mathematics background, not a physics background, so problems which require "energy considerations" still confuse me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a first attempt: we use conservation of momentum and find |p_{\text{before}}|=|p_{\text{after}}| \Rightarrow 2\gamma m_0v =2\gamma h\nu / c \Rightarrow m_0v=h\nu/c = |p_i| for each gamma ray p_i where the last inequality is from a previous exercise which asks us to show this for each photon. So I end up with *almost* the solution except I have v instead of c. Where did I go wrong?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top