Poss Textbook Error Concerning Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights a significant error in the textbook "Matter & Interactions Volume 3" regarding the velocity vector statement, which lacks necessary components. Participants note that the provided answer uses information that cannot be derived from the problem's given data, indicating a major typo. There is confusion about whether the problem is a subset of another question, but it is confirmed that it stands alone and contains errors. The discrepancy between the stated velocity of 2E7 and the solution's speed of 3.7E7 is emphasized, suggesting a potential relativistic context. Overall, the text is criticized for containing multiple errors that could mislead students.
MariettaBlau
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
From Matter & Interactions Volume 3:

Screen_Shot_2014_07_22_at_1_25_24_PM.png


Am I correct that there is something wrong with the statement of the velocity vector here? The components are missing in the statement of the problem, yes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the proscribed answer clearly uses information that cannot be derived from the information given, that would definitely be a case. A very large typo. :)
 
Yea that doesn't look right to me. Either components or phi,theta measurements. Is it possible that this question is a subset of another question that did give angle measurements? Or maybe it's an entirely different solution, as the problem statement says the velocity is 2E7, whereas the solution says the speed is 3.7E7.

This looks relativistic, is that speed relative to a moving observer?
 
Thank you both for the replies. I just wanted to be sure. It was not a subset of another question. Just an error. This text seems to have quite a few unfortunately.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top