Possible Magnitudes of Vectors in Orthogonal Configurations

  • Thread starter Thread starter themadhatter1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonal Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the magnitudes of the vector v formed by the sum of three unit vectors a, b, and c in both 2D and 3D spaces, given their orthogonal relationships. In 2D, the possible magnitudes of |v| are identified as √2 and √5, depending on the specific configurations of the vectors. The participants clarify that in 2D, it is impossible to have three independent, mutually orthogonal unit vectors, leading to the conclusion that one vector must be a linear combination of the others. In 3D, the magnitude of |v| is expressed as √(2cosθ + 3) based on the angle θ between the vectors. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering general cases rather than relying solely on specific examples to solve the problem.
themadhatter1
Messages
139
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A.
Given unit vectors a, b, c in the x, y-plane such that a · b = b · c = 0,
let v = a + b + c; what are the possible values of |v|?
B.
Repeat, except a, b, and c are unit vectors in 3-space

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I have solutions for both that I'm reasonably sure of, I'd just like a 2nd opinion to make sure I solved the problem correctly.

For part A I got |v| = \sqrt{2}, \sqrt{5}
I took c = <0,1>, a = <1,0> b = <0,1> in this combination |v| = \sqrt{2}.
The only other special case is when a = b in this case, |v| = \sqrt{5}For Part B I took c = <0,0,1>, a = <1,0,0> and b = &lt;cos\theta,sin\theta,0&gt;

Therefore, |v| = \sqrt{2cos\theta + 3}, 0\leq\theta\leq 2\pi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem with your argument is that you have picked specific, very handy, vectors a,b, and c that satisfy your properties. So you have answered the question for only those three vectors. You have to argue it for any three such vectors.
 
Yes, but since the vectors have to be unit vectors and both vectors a and c are orthogonal to b, |v| is going to be the same regardless. You can rotate a vector by a specific angle and the others have to stay orthogonal so they will move as well by the angle maintaining |v|. That's why I chose the most convenient vectors to work with.
 
Last edited:
themadhatter1 said:
Yes, but since the vectors have to be unit vectors and both vectors a and c are orthogonal to b, |v| is going to be the same regardless. You can rotate a vector by a specific angle and the others have to stay orthogonal so they will move as well by the angle maintaining |v|. That's why I chose the most convenient vectors to work with.

Everything you say is true. If this is homework, I would at the minimum include this additional argument. Still, it is just as easy and more elegant to do it with arbitrary vectors in the first place.
 
i don't understand,

if b.c = 0, then how come b = c? i.e how can b=<0,1> = c ?
 
why issn't part 1

v = a + b + c
|v| = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2 + c^2} = \sqrt{3} ?
 
themadhatter1 said:
Given unit vectors a, b, c in the x, y-plane such that a · b = b · c = 0,


I took c = <0,1>, a = <1,0> b = <0,1>

So you took c=b. Being unit vectors, their scalar product is 1 instead of zero. Which two vectors can be identical instead?

ehild
 
quietrain said:
why issn't part 1

v = a + b + c
|v| = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2 + c^2} = \sqrt{3} ?

You do not have 3 independent, mutually orthogonal vectors in 2D. One of the vectors a, b, c is linear combination of the other two.

ehild
 
themadhatter1 said:
Yes, but since the vectors have to be unit vectors and both vectors a and c are orthogonal to b, |v| is going to be the same regardless. You can rotate a vector by a specific angle and the others have to stay orthogonal so they will move as well by the angle maintaining |v|. That's why I chose the most convenient vectors to work with.
Another reason for doing the problem in general is that your specific vectors might not cover every possibility, which has indeed happened here.
 
  • #10
ehild said:
You do not have 3 independent, mutually orthogonal vectors in 2D. One of the vectors a, b, c is linear combination of the other two.

ehild

its something like this right?

*****B
**** ^
**** |
A<---|--->C

since they are 3 independ orthogonal vectors, how can one of them be a linear combination of the other two?

how does he get sqrt 2 or sqrt 5?
 
  • #11
They are not three independent vectors.

a=c or a=-c, so either v=2a+b or v=b

The magnitude of v can not be sqrt(2).

ehild
 
  • #12
You have already been told that there aren't three independent vectors in two dimensional space! The problem does NOT say that they are independent. In particular the problem, does NOT say that c is orthogonal to a. You are given that b is orthogonal to a and c and they are all of unit length which means that either a= c or a= -c.

If a= c, then v= 2a+ b and, since a and b are unit length and orthogonal, the length of v is \sqrt{2^2+ 1}= \sqrt{5}. If a= -c, then v= b which has length 1.
 
  • #13
ohh.h... isee... thanks!
 
Back
Top