Possible to percieve God in this ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yesicanread
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between Newton's third law of motion and philosophical concepts of action and reaction, suggesting a connection to the nature of God and existence. It posits that every action has an equal and opposite reaction, drawing parallels between physical laws and metaphysical ideas. The conversation delves into geometric representations, such as triangles and pentagons, to illustrate conservation of energy and the nature of action. Questions arise about the infinite nature of the cosmos and the power of action derived from "nothing." Ultimately, the discourse shifts toward philosophical implications, leading to a suggestion to move the discussion to a philosophy forum.
yesicanread
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
This is from Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion#Newton.27s_third_law

Newton's third law

Alternative formulations:

* Whenever one body exerts force upon a second body, the second body exerts an equal and opposite force upon the first body.
* For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

If you strike an object with a force of 200 N, then the object also strikes you (with a force of 200 N). Not only does a bullet exert force upon a target; but, the target exerts equal force upon the bullet. Not only do planets accelerate toward stars; but, stars accelerate toward planets. The reaction force has the same line of action, and is of the same type and magnitude as the original force.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plancks_constant

Plank's Constant.

Planck's constant has units of energy multiplied by time, which are the units of action. These units may also be written as momentum times distance (N·m·s), which are the units of angular momentum.

Also A line conserves Energy. Action = Action, Line = Line.

1.) On a Pentagon.
Two linear points are:
(A) Equal, and opposite reaction.
or
(B) Planks constant.

2.) The pentagon is on a plane.
A plane can be defined by three points.(Euclidean geometry)

3.) Three points can conserve energy.
Three lines Conserve energy too.

4.) (Action = Reaction = 1 Line)
+
(Geometry = 3 planar, non-colinear, points)
= 3 Points conserve energy, A Triangle.

5.) The Triangle contains Action.

6.) Using the definition for a plane.

The Triangles Action = The triangles Reaction
<
2 Reaction

Where is the fourth line ?
The triangle inequality theorem is correct.

7.) When we count a Triangle, we don't count the Triangle Action point.
The Triangle contains action. Less than 2 Reactions
2 Reactions, equal and opposite the Triangle Action.
Therefore. 2 Reactions = 2 Reactions.

8.) Create the triangle Centre Action.
The reaction will be 5 Lines
Reacting to the Action.

9.) Using division.
A cup can be acted upon to cause 5 linear reactions, filling the cup.

10.) The planes points have two opposite perpendicular vertices.

11.) A simplex (Pyramid), is made from the plane triangle to the vertices.

12.) Make three circumferences. Using the two opposite perpendicular vertices, and the triangle that defines the plane.

13.) One vertex has two properties. Three joined semicircles. And being a vertex.

14.) Vertex action/Semicircle action, = ( Action = = + Opposite reaction. A Line.)

15.) The line is the result. The action must be from the centre of the triangle.
The image made must be the pentagon. The result of the simplex(Pyramid) Must mean Action is in the centre of the three joined pentagons. 3 Dimensions, and time from Action.

16.) Metric from the three pentagon points are reactions from nothing = Action.
If God is Nothing, does that mean God is action ? Mankind acts in thought, etc...

Is Height infinite ? Is the cosmos infinite ? Height has a limit. The plane is within the three pentagons. So, a plane is confined as well.

Metic that allows action from nothing. How powerful is action from Nothing ? Can you measure it ? Your thoughts have power, is it more more powerful than action from nothing ?

I posted the ideas that made the quote up, in the theory development forum. Since it can't be "Tested", it doesn't belong there. :smile:

So it's "Philosophy" then, is it ? :smile:

Alright. I'll post it in the Philosophy forum.

Peace.

b11ng00
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, no, it doesn't belong on the site at all.

- Warren
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top