Potential and Kinetic energy problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between potential and kinetic energy in a marble rolling down a ramp. It highlights that potential energy at the top (Ep) should equal kinetic energy at the bottom (Ek), assuming no energy loss. The user is confused about measuring final velocity and the implications of friction on energy loss. Key concepts include calculating total mechanical energy (Em) and understanding that energy cannot be destroyed, but can be transformed or lost due to friction and other factors. The conversation emphasizes the importance of measuring the marble's travel distance and final velocity to fully grasp the energy transformations involved.
missphysics12
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Potential and Kinetic energy problem!

Homework Statement


im still stuck on the assignment: is the potential energy of a marble at the top of a ramp the same as the kinetic energy of the marble at the bottom of the ramp. I don't know the co-efficient of friction of wood but our teacher has told us keywords, they are: PREDICTIONS, measure the length the ball travels after its traveled down the ramp, FINAL VELOCITY and SEARCH DEEPER. so i have no idea what he's talking about


Homework Equations


?


The Attempt at a Solution



we have measured height of the ramp and different times for the marble, can anyone tell me how i would measure final velocity? I am really confused, and what does he mean by search deeper?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well the potential energy is calculated by how high the object is (Ep=mgh), and since kinetic is the object when it is in motion (Ek=1/2mv^2), you can safely say that if Ep=0, Ek=Ep@point 1.

The thinking behind it is calculating the total mechanical energy, which is Em=Ep+Ek, so in theory the kinetic energy should equal what the Potential was at the top of the ramp. And since you "cannot destroy energy" there will be no energy lost, but as you know friction will come into play along with other sources that may cause the loss of energy from the object (such as sound. this may be what he's saying by search deeper)

So somewhere to start, at the top of the ramp, you know that Ek=0, therefore Em=Ep
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top