Potential cancer treatment discovered thanks to Malaria

AI Thread Summary
Research indicates that pregnant women are more vulnerable to malaria due to a specific sugar in the placenta, which is also prevalent in various cancers. The malaria protein that targets this sugar shows potential for cancer treatment, demonstrating effectiveness in cell cultures and mouse models, with human trials anticipated in a few years. However, concerns arise regarding immune reactions to the foreign protein used in the treatment, especially since individuals with prior malaria exposure may have antibodies against it. Mouse experiments utilized immunocompromised models to avoid immune responses, but this may not translate to human treatments. An alternative approach involves developing monoclonal antibodies targeting the same epitope as the malaria protein, though their effectiveness remains uncertain. The complexity of biology and the challenges in addressing these issues suggest that human testing should be approached cautiously and may take several years to initiate.
Messages
37,382
Reaction score
14,215
Sometimes the enemy of your enemy is still an enemy, but also a friend...

Pregnant women are more susceptible to malaria, scientists were able to link this to a specific sugar in the placenta that seems to be relevant for its rapid growth. The same sugar molecule is found in most types of cancer. The protein which malaria uses to target that sugar can be used to target cancer cells.
Seems to be very effective both with cell cultures and in mice, tests with humans could start in a few years.

News 1
News 2
 
  • Like
Likes Evo, fredreload and Greg Bernhardt
Biology news on Phys.org
Very cool :smile:
 
mfb said:
Seems to be very effective both with cell cultures and in mice, tests with humans could start in a few years.
We need to speed this up!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
One concern with the treatment is that it uses a foreign protein which is likely to provoke a reaction from the body's immune system (indeed, those who have had malaria may already have antibodies against that protein). The mice experiments were done using a xenograft tumor models in which researchers put human cancer cells into mice. These experiments require the use of immunocompromised mice, or else the mouse's immune systems would react to the human tumor cells. The fact that the mice were immunocompromised probably allowed the researchers to circumvent problems with immunity. However, they will likely run into those problems when trying to treat humans. A better test would have been to try to treat tumors in non-immunocompromised mice.

However, a promising alternative approach would be to generate monoclonal antibodies against the same eptitope that the malaria protein targets. Whether those antibodies show the same specificity and efficacy, however, will remain to be seen.

Biology is complicated, science is hard, and addressing issues like these are why it should take a few years before we should be thinking of testing this therapy in humans.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb, berkeman and Greg Bernhardt
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top