Potential difference across a capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of potential difference across a capacitor during its charging phase. The user derived the charge on the capacitor as q = 6C[1 - exp(-5t/12C)], concluding that the potential difference is 6 V when fully charged. However, confusion arises regarding the potential difference being 10 V due to the capacitor's plates aligning with the battery terminals. Clarification is provided that while the capacitor is fully charged and no current flows through it, current still flows through the resistors, confirming the 6 V potential difference across the capacitor. This insight simplifies the user's understanding of the problem.
issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Hi

I have a question about part a). Using Kirchoff's rules, I got the expression for the charge
on the capacitor during the charging phase.

q\, = \, 6C \left [ 1- exp ( - \frac{5t}{12C})\right ]

and as t goes to infinity, we see that

q = 6C

so the potential difference across the capacitor would be 6 V . But then left plate of the capacitor is at same potential as the positive terminal of the battery , since there is no potential difference across any resistor (as there is no current) and the right plate would be
at the same potential as the negative terminal of the battery. So potential difference across
the capacitor should turn out to be 10 V. But I checked my answer and the potential difference is 6 V. So what's happening here ?

thanks
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    25.4 KB · Views: 1,252
Physics news on Phys.org
When the capacitor is fully charged, no current flows through it. However, current continues to flow through all the resistors, as long as the battery is connected.

1 Amp flows through the 8Ω and 2Ω resistors. 2 Amps flow through the 1Ω and 4Ω resistors. From these values you check that indeed, the capacitor has 6 V across it.
 
Thanks Sammy,

that makes solving the part a) even simpler. I didn't think of it before
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top