Potential difference across an inductor

AI Thread Summary
The potential difference across an inductor is an induced electromotive force (emf) generated by changing magnetic flux through its coils. Electric potential is typically defined for static electric fields, but the electric field created by induction is rotational, complicating the definition of potential in this context. Resnick & Halliday assert that electric potential is not applicable to fields produced by induction. This raises questions about how to define potential across an inductor for circuit analysis. Further exploration of advanced texts, such as Feynman's lectures on AC circuits, may provide clarity on this topic.
Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
I have some confusion about how emf across an inductor is generated:

The potential difference across an inductor is an induced emf produced by the changing magnetic flux through the coils of the inductor.

In general, electric potential is a scalar potential of the electric field. Hence the electric field is the gradient field of the electric potential, and is a conservative vector field (for stationary charges at least). Conservative vector fields are irrotational (having zero curl) and irrotational vector fields are conservative (on simply connected domains).

Now according to Resnick & Halliday, "electric potential has meaning only for electric fields that are produced by static charges; it has no meaning for electric fields that are produced by induction." This is because the electric field induced by a changing magnetic flux is rotational in nature, rather than emanating from a source of charge.

So if we can't define a potential function for the induced electric field, how can we define potential across an inductor that allows us to solve circuits etc. ?

Note my knowledge of E&M is rather rudimentary, but am willing to browse through more advanced texts to get a better understanding.

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
check Feynman lectures on physics, part II chapter on AC circuits beginning from 22-1. I think it is what your are looking for. I think Feynman explains it better than I would.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top