Potential difference and current

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between potential difference and current in the context of internal resistance in circuits. It clarifies that while V=IR holds true, the potential difference measured is affected by the internal resistance, leading to a decrease in voltage available at the terminals as current increases. The lost voltage within the internal resistance plus the voltage across the load equals the original battery voltage. Understanding the circuit layout is crucial for grasping these concepts, as they consistently apply across experiments. Overall, the principles of electricity remain reliable despite initial confusion.
Supernova123
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have trouble understanding the internal resistance experiment in which potential difference decreases as current increases because I thought they are usually directly proportional to each other. Is there any concept that I am missing? I know that the lost voltage will be greater as current increases but doesn't this apply to other experiments as well? Does the experimental setup have anything to do with it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Supernova123 said:
I have trouble understanding the internal resistance experiment in which potential difference decreases as current increases because I thought they are usually directly proportional to each other. Is there any concept that I am missing? I know that the lost voltage will be greater as current increases but doesn't this apply to other experiments as well? Does the experimental setup have anything to do with it?
Hi and welcome.
Yes V=IR always. The V in question, however, is the V that is dropped / lost as current goes through the internal resistance - leaving fewer volts, delivered to the battery terminals. The volts lost 'inside' plus the volts across the load (the terminals) will add up to the original battery voltage - or emf, as it's called. The rules apply everywhere and if you draw out the circuit you can see what's happening. Otherwise look at this link.
 
I think I understand now. Thanks for your time :)
 
Supernova123 said:
I think I understand now. Thanks for your time :)

Electricity can be confusing as it sometimes seems counter-intuitive. But you can be sure that it always follows the rules and it will not let you down with a 'but not when there's an R in the month' type of exception. The secret is always to work from what you know towards what you don't know. (More difficult to do than you would think in some cases.)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top