Potential difference due to a continuous charge distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at the center of curvature of a circular arc with a uniformly distributed charge of Q = -25.6 pC and radius R = 3.71 cm. The correct approach involves using the equation V = ∫kdq/r, where k is a constant and r remains constant during integration. The participant initially misapplied the integration limits and variables, leading to confusion. Ultimately, the correct potential was found to be V = -6.20 V after clarifying the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of the constant k (Coulomb's constant) and its application
  • Ability to calculate linear charge density (λ) from total charge and geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential for continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about the application of integration in electrostatics, particularly for curved geometries
  • Explore the concept of linear charge density (λ) and its calculations
  • Investigate the differences between point charge and continuous charge potential calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving electrostatics problems, particularly those related to charge distributions and electric potential calculations.

Alec11
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This is my first time using this site so please excuse me if I missed any guidelines.

1. Homework Statement

A plastic rod having a uniformly distributed charge Q=-25.6pC has been bent into a circular arc of radius R=3.71cm and central angle ∅=120°. With V=0 at infinity, what is the electric potential at P, the center of curvature of the rod?

Homework Equations


V=∫dV=∫kdq/r

The Attempt at a Solution


V=∫dV=∫kdq/r=(kλ)∫dΘ=(kλ)(2π/3), which is wrong.

The issue that I'm having with this problem is that I don't understand why the integration is done the way that it is. The equation I'm given to solve it is V=∫kdq/r, which equals out to V=kq/r after the integration. I'm confused because this is just the same exact equation used to find V for point charges. Why are you not required to put the integral in terms of theta and integrate over the length of the arc? If the charge distribution were kept as a straight rod, then I would have to integrate over the entire distribution, but since its a circular arc that just goes out the window.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WELCOME TO PF!

Alec11 said:
V=∫dV=∫kdq/r=(kλ)∫dΘ=(kλ)(2π/3), which is wrong.
Why do you say this is wrong?

The equation I'm given to solve it is V=∫kdq/r, which equals out to V=kq/r after the integration. I'm confused because this is just the same exact equation used to find V for point charges. Why are you not required to put the integral in terms of theta and integrate over the length of the arc?

Consider V=∫kdq/r.
k is a constant. Is r also a constant for this integration?
 
Because I tried doing that for this homework problem and it results in a wrong answer. I looked up how to do it and someone said that you just reduce the equation to V=kq/r, which gives the correct answer. This held true for every homework problem with circular arc shaped charge distributions. And yes, r is a constant for this integration.
 
Alec11 said:
Because I tried doing that for this homework problem and it results in a wrong answer.
What value did you use for λ?
And yes, r is a constant for this integration.
OK, so what does the integral ∫kdq/r reduce to if you "pull out" all the constants?
 
TSny said:
What value did you use for λ?

I calculated λ=Q/(rθ) = (-25.6x10^(-12))/((2π/3)*(0.0371)) = (-3.29x10^(-10)) C/m

TSny said:
OK, so what does the integral ∫kdq/r reduce to if you "pull out" all the constants?

It becomes (k/r)∫dq
 
Alec11 said:
I calculated λ=Q/(rθ) = (-25.6x10^(-12))/((2π/3)*(0.0371)) = (-3.29x10^(-10)) C/m
Looks good. What value did you get for V when you used this value of λ?
It becomes (k/r)∫dq
Good. What does ∫dq evaluate to?
 
TSny said:
Looks good. What value did you get for V when you used this value of λ?

I get V = -6.20V, which actually turns out to be right. Looking back at my previous attempts, it seems I accidentally went from dq => rθdθ, instead of dq => rdθ, which explains why I thought I was wrong originally. Thanks for helping me figure that out!
 
OK. Glad it got cleared up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K