Potential difference vs Potential energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion emphasizes the distinction between potential difference and potential energy, highlighting that only changes in potential energy are physically significant. The value of potential energy is dependent on the chosen reference point, but the change in potential energy remains constant regardless of that reference. For instance, lifting a mass from a desk to a shelf results in the same change in potential energy, irrespective of whether the reference point is the floor or the desk. Additionally, gravitational potential is typically negative, with variations indicating how much less negative it is in different locations. Understanding potential difference is crucial for practical applications in physics.
Tommy1995
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
G'day!
I was looking over my notes about gravitational potential energy and I came across the graphs that I drew in class of the gravitational potential energy of a mass with reference point at infinity compared with the potential energy of a mass with reference point at the surface of the earth. They had totally different potential energies, one was negative, the other was positive. And then I jotted down a little side note saying, "potential difference is important, not potential energy". School isn't until another 6 weeks so could someone please help me justify why its more important to observe a mass' potential difference rather than its potential energy? I sort of have the idea in my head but I just can't express it in words...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The point being made is that only changes in potential energy (from one point to another) have physical significance. The particular value you may assign at some location depends on where you choose your reference point, but the change in PE when going from point A to point B does not.

For example: If a mass m is lifted from a desk to a shelf, it doesn't matter if you take the reference point (where PE = 0) to be the floor or the desk or anywhere else. The change in PE will be mgΔh no matter what.
 
With gravity, the Potential is always Negative. It's just a matter of 'how much negative'. In some places, the potential will be Higher (less negative) than in others.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top