Potential Energy as a function of x

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating potential energy as a function of position x, given a force of 8e^{-2x} and an initial potential energy of 5 at x = 0. The integration of the force leads to the expression for work, W(x) = -4e^{-2x} + C, where C is a constant determined by the initial conditions. After solving for C, the correct potential energy function is derived as U(x) = 1 - 4e^{-2x}. The thread concludes with the realization that the integration limits were initially overlooked, leading to confusion in the calculations.
KvnBushi
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Potential Energy as a function of x

Homework Statement


Take U = 5 at x = 0 and calculate potential energy as a function of x, corresponding to the force:
8e^{-2x}


Homework Equations


W_{net} = U_i - U_f
W = \int_a^b F_x dx



The Attempt at a Solution



\int 8e^{-2x} dx = -4e^{-2x} = W(x)

W(x) = -4e^{-2x} = U_i(x) - U_f(x)
U_f(x) = U_i(x) + 4e^{-2x}
U_f(x) = 5 + 4e^{-2x}

correct answer: U(x) = 1 + 4e^{-2x}

Any ideas how i went wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You were working with definite integral, I guess. when you integrated 8exp(-2x), you should have put the limits (x = 0 and x = x).
 
SOLVED

W(x) = \int 8e^{-2x} = -4e^{-2x} + C ( I forgot the C earlier)
W(x) = U_i(x) - U_f(x)
-4e^{-2x} + C = 5 - U_f(x)
U_f(x) = 5 - 4e^{-2x} - C

SOLVE FOR C

U(0) = 5 = 5 - 4(1) - C
C = 4

SOLVE FOR U(x)

U_f(x) = 5 - 4e^{-2x} - 4

U_f(x) = 1 - 4e^{-2x}
 
Sourabh N said:
You were working with definite integral, I guess. when you integrated 8exp(-2x), you should have put the limits (x = 0 and x = x).

I am going to try this way as well when I get back from eating. Cheers!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top