Potential Energy of an Atom Due to Its Charge Distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the potential energy of an atomic nucleus modeled as a uniformly charged sphere. The initial approach used Gauss' law to derive the electric field and energy density but led to an incorrect total energy calculation. The correct method involves integrating the energy density over all space to find the total potential energy. The potential energy for a uniformly charged nucleus is derived as (3Z^2.e^2)/(20.pi.epsilon-0.a). The user successfully resolved their confusion with guidance on integrating the electric field correctly.
Hoofbeat
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Could someone help me with this:

=====
Q. The nucleus of an atom can be considered to be a charge of +Ze uniformly distributed throughout a sphere of radius a. Show that the potential energy of a nucleus due to its charge is (3Z^2.e^2)/(20.pi.epsilon-0.a). What would the potential energy be if the charge was spread uniformly over the surface of the nucleus.
=====

I used Gauss' law and spherical coordinates (we can ignore all components other than R due to symmetry) to give the electric field (radial component):

Er = +Ze/(4.pi.epsilon-0.a^2)

Energy Density = 1/2.Epsilon-0.E^2

But we want total energy, thus:

Energy = 1/2.Epsilon-0.E^2.Volume

Energy = (Z^2.e^2)/(24.pi.Epsilon-0.a)

However, this is clearly wrong. Could someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?! :frown: Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electric field Er you computed is the electric field at the surface of the nucleus. But you want to find the total potential energy of the nucleus, which is the integral:

\int_{whole space} 1/2 \epsilon_0 E^2 dV

So you need to know the E every in space (use Gauss' law).
 
Thanks, I've now managed to solve the problem :D
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top