Potential Energy of System (Uniform Rod and String)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the potential energy of a system involving a uniform rod and a string. The gravitational potential energy (GPE) of the rod is expressed as mgacosθ plus a constant. The elastic potential energy (EPE) is derived using the extension of the string, leading to a formula that simplifies to EPE = mga(3 - 2 cos θ - √(5 - 4 cos θ)). The total potential energy (V) combines both GPE and EPE, with a noted discrepancy regarding a constant term. Ultimately, the contributor realizes that the constant difference in the mark scheme is negligible.
FeDeX_LaTeX
Science Advisor
Messages
436
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg339/scaled.php?server=339&filename=53171696.jpg&res=medium


Homework Equations


GPE = mgh, EPE = λx^2 / 2l


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm taking the horizontal line through A as the zero-level for potential energy. Clearly, the GPE of the rod is mgacosθ + constant. To find the elastic potential energy, I noted that:

EPE = \frac{0.5mgx^2}{4a}

I said that the extension x is given by the length of BC minus the natural length. To get BC, I used the cosine rule;

BC2 = 16a2 + 4a2 - 16a2cosθ

So BC = 2a√(5 - 4cosθ).

Then,

EPE = \frac{mg(2a \sqrt{5 - 4 \cos \theta} - 2a)^2}{8a}

Which, to me, simplifies to:

EPE = mga(3 - 2 \cos \theta - \sqrt{5 - 4 \cos \theta})

The total potential energy V can thus be expressed as:

V = -mga(\cos \theta - 3 + \sqrt{5 - 4 \cos \theta}) + \mathbb{constant}.

This is almost identical to what they've got, except without the 3. Where have I gone wrong?

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sigh... just realized in the mark scheme they've counted the +3 as 'a constant' so negligible. Ugh. Sorry to whoever was reading this thread.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top