Potential Engery and Energy Conservation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving potential energy and energy conservation related to a spring-loaded cannon-ball launcher and a trampoline. JO, weighing 60 kg, is launched and lands on a trampoline that compresses below ground level upon impact. The spring constants for the cannon-ball launcher and trampoline are given as 1000 N/m and 4000 N/m, respectively. Participants are asked to identify knowns and unknowns in the scenario and apply the conservation of energy principle to determine the maximum compression of the trampoline. The conversation encourages collaboration and problem-solving among participants.
kuzthai
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
JO is "loaded" into a spring-loaded "cannon-ball" launcher as PICTURE. She lands into a springy trampoline that is initially at ground level. THe Earth is dug out under the trampoline so that when she lands, the trampoline will compress below ground level.

At position 1, 60kg JO is at rest, compressed against the cannon-ball spring. This spring is compressed a distance of 0.2m from its equilibrium position, with a spring constant of 1000 N/m. At the time, JO is at a vertical distance 1 m above the ground. Don't worry .. JO won't get hurt; her speed is slow and the springy trampoline will soften her impact.

At position 2, JO has landed into the springy trampoline (k2 = 4000 N/m) and the trampoline is maximally compressed a distance X2 below its equilibrium position. Suppose that we can neglect friction and the trampoline acts like a "normal" spring.

QUESTION:

a). WRITE DOWN the KNOWS and UNKNOWS with standard notation. For example, the spring constant of the trampoline is K2 = 4000 N/m.

NOTE: the reference is taken at position 2, the maxium compression of the trampoline. USE "x" for springs and "y" for vertical distance. Don't forget the subscripts, "1" and "2".

b). Using the conservation of energy equation, U1 + K1 + Wother = U2 + K2, determine how far below equilibrium position the spring will be compressed. Make sure to first cross out the terms that are zero and write expressions for each term using variables m, k2, etc.

thanks for helping..
 

Attachments

  • JO.JPG
    JO.JPG
    8.8 KB · Views: 433
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi kuzthai! welcome to pf! :wink:

show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top