Potential of a uniformly polarized sphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustgil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Sphere
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the potential of a uniformly polarized sphere using the provided equation. The potential expression involves integrating the polarization vector over the volume of the sphere, factoring in the geometry through the law of cosines. Participants emphasize the importance of using spherical coordinates for both the observation point and the volume element to accurately express the integrand. The direction of polarization is clarified to be uniform in the z direction, affecting the dot product with the unit vector. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for careful setup of the integral and adherence to the correct coordinate system for accurate results.
Dustgil
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the potential of a uniformly polarized sphere directly from eq. 9

Homework Equations



V(r)=k \int \frac {P(r') \cdot \hat{r}} {r^2} d\tau

The Attempt at a Solution


P is a constant and can be factored out. Since r is taken, call the radius of the sphere R and and an arbitrary radial length l. Then by the law of cosines we can express the denominator for every volume element as.

r^2=l^2+z^2-2lzcos\theta

This is where I'm stuck. What can I do with r hat? Nothing? I understand that its a unit vector in the direction of of the volume element to the point I'm trying to evaluate at, but I'm not sure if I need to change anything about it or not. z is constant so in theory once I have that changed I can evaluate the integral. Is there an easier way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It says uniformly polarized, but what is the direction of polarization? Keep in mind it's actually a vector field, and you are dotting it with ##\hat r##.
 
Your expression for the potential should be
$$ V(r)=k \int \frac {\vec{P}(r') \cdot (\vec{r}-\vec{r}')} {|\vec{r}-\vec{r}'|^{3/2}} d^3 r' $$
where ##\vec{r}## is the position of the point of interest and ##\vec{r}'## is the position of volume element ##d^3 r'##. Note the integration over primed coordinates. I suggest that you write each of the vectors in the integrand in terms of unit vectors, then assemble the integrand.
 
Okay so P is uniform in the z direction. z hat dotted with r hat is equal to the cosine of the angle between the two, which I call phi. This angle is the top angle in the triangle that i utilized with the law of cosines to find r^2. Using the law of cosines again, I can relate phi to the rest of the triangle and plug in for r.

<br /> l^{2}=z^2+r^2-2zrcos\phi

cos\phi = \frac {l^2-z^2-r^2} {-2zr}

With some simplication,

kP \int \frac {z - lcos\theta} {(z^2+l^2-2zlcos\theta)^{3/2}}l^2sin\theta dld\theta d\psi

How's that integral look?
 
You are cutting corners that will lead you into trouble. The integration is over primed coordinates which your integrand does not show.
1. Use spherical coordinates ##(r, \theta, \phi)## for ##\vec{r}## and ##(r', \theta ', \phi ')## for ##\vec{r}'##.
2. Write expressions for ##\vec{r}## and ##\vec{r}'## in terms of these coordinates in the Cartesian representation. Without loss of generality, you can set ##\phi=0## and ##\phi ' = 0##.
3. Find an expression for ##(\vec{r}-\vec{r}') ##.
4. Find an expression for ##|\vec{r}-\vec{r}'|^{3/2} ##.
5. Take the dot product ##\vec{P}(r') \cdot (\vec{r}-\vec{r}')##.
6. Assemble the integrand. It should be in terms of ##(r, \theta, \phi)## and ##(r', \theta ', \phi ')##.
7. Integrate over primed coordinates. I would do ##\theta '## first.
 
  • Like
Likes TJGilb
kuruman is right. I didn't notice at first but your equation is slightly off. But, if that's what the book is giving you/asking you to use then so be it.
 
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...