Potential of spherical charge distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the electrostatic potential equation for a spherical charge distribution using the Poisson equation. The user initially attempts to apply the general integral definition of potential but seeks a more direct method through spherical coordinates. They encounter challenges in manipulating the equation after applying Gauss's law and integrating the electric field. Ultimately, they resolve the issue by recognizing that the total charge Q can be expressed as the integral of charge density over volume, allowing them to complete the derivation successfully. The conversation highlights the interplay between different mathematical approaches in electrostatics.
Observer Two
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I want to derive this equation:

V(r) = \frac{1}{\epsilon_0} [\frac{1}{r} \int_0^r \! r'^2 \rho(r') \, d r' + \int_r^{\infty} \! r' \rho(r') \, d r' ]

of a spherical charge distribution.

I can do it with the general integral definition of the electrostatic potential (which is basically the utilization of the Greens function). But isn't it also possible to derive it directly from the Poisson equation:

\nabla^2 V(r) = -\frac{\rho(r)}{\epsilon_0}

Using spherical coordinates:

\frac{1}{r^2} \frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r^2 \frac{\partial V(r)}{\partial r}) = -\frac{\rho(r)}{\epsilon_0}

(r^2 \frac{\partial V(r)}{\partial r}) = -\int \! \frac{\rho(r)}{\epsilon_0} r^2 \, d r

Here is the part where I'm stuck. I could maybe "split" the right hand side in the following way:

(r^2 \frac{\partial V(r)}{\partial r}) = \frac{1}{\epsilon_0} [\int_r^{\infty} \! \rho(r') r'^2 \, d r' + \int_0^r \! \rho(r') r'^2 \, d r']

But then I'm lost how to continue since there is another derivative on the left hand side.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use Gauss's law to get E(r). Then integrate \phi(r)=\int_r^\infty E(r')dr'
by parts.
 
I'm missing something here it seems. E(r) = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2} obviously. Integrating that doesn't give me the general expression that I want though.

Edit: Nevermind, got it! Q = Q(r) = \int_V \! \rho(r) \, d V Then it works. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top