Find Potential of Disk of Radius R, Charge Q w/ Equ 1

  • Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Potential
In summary: The equation should be ##V = -\int_{\infty}^{xf} E_{disk}\, dx##, where ##E_{disk}## is the electric field due to the disk at a distance ##x## from the disk. The limits of integration are from infinity to the distance between the point and the disk, not from infinity to infinity. This is because the electric field is only present within a certain distance from the disk, not at infinity.
  • #1
Miike012
1,009
0
I would like to know if there is a way of finding the Potential of a disk of radius R and charge Q with uniform charge distribution using Equ 1 instead of Equ 2?

Equ 1:
ΔV = -∫Edotdx rather than

Equ 2:
ΔV = ∫dUelec potential

For Equ 1 I'm guessing that the equation would be of the form...

ΔV = -∫∫Ecos(∏/2)dA = -∫∫EdA = -∫∫Edxdy
And
Limits of int (X-Direction): -√(R2 - y2) to √(R2 - y2)
Limits of int (Y-Direction): -√(R2 - x2) to √(R2 - x2)

And E would be the EField of a disk...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You can certainly integrate the E field to find the potential, but your attempt is wrong. It looks like you're confusing calculating the potential with calculating E.

To use equation 1, you need to have already found ##\vec{E}##, and you'd calculate the line integral along any path C that runs from infinity to the point ##\vec{r}##:
$$ V(\vec{r}) = -\int_C \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{x}.$$ To find ##\vec{E}##, you'd calculate the contribution from each piece of the disk to the electric field at some point in space, and then integrate over the entire disk.

To use equation 2, you take a similar approach as you do when calculating ##\vec{E}##. You calculate the contribution from each piece of the disk to the electric potential at some point in space, and then integrate over the entire disk. Calculating electric potential is a bit easier than calculating the field because the potential is a scalar quantity. You don't have to worry about summing vectors like you do when calculating the electric field.
 
  • #3
vela said:
You can certainly integrate the E field to find the potential, but your attempt is wrong. It looks like you're confusing calculating the potential with calculating E.

To use equation 1, you need to have already found ##\vec{E}##, and you'd calculate the line integral along any path C that runs from infinity to the point ##\vec{r}##:
$$ V(\vec{r}) = -\int_C \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{x}.$$ To find ##\vec{E}##, you'd calculate the contribution from each piece of the disk to the electric field at some point in space, and then integrate over the entire disk.

So equation 1 would be..

V = -∫Ediskdx and integrate from xf = distance from point to disk and xi = ∞. is that correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Yes, basically.
 
  • #5


Yes, it is possible to use Equation 1 to find the potential of a disk with uniform charge distribution. Equation 1 is known as the line integral form of the electric potential, while Equation 2 is known as the potential energy form. Both equations are equivalent and can be used interchangeably.

To use Equation 1, you would need to first calculate the electric field of the disk at a given point. This can be done using Gauss's law or by integrating the electric field equation for a charged disk. Once you have the electric field, you can then integrate it along a path from a reference point to the point where you want to find the potential. This path can be chosen in any way as long as it ends at the desired point.

In the case of a disk with uniform charge distribution, the electric field will be constant at any point on the disk's surface. Therefore, the path of integration can be chosen to simply go from the center of the disk to the desired point. The limits of integration will depend on the geometry of the disk and can be calculated using the equations you have provided.

Overall, both Equation 1 and Equation 2 can be used to find the potential of a disk with uniform charge distribution. It is up to the researcher to choose which equation is more convenient to use in a given situation.
 

1. What is the equation for finding the potential of a disk of radius R with a charge Q?

The equation for finding the potential of a disk of radius R with a charge Q is V = kQ/R, where k is the Coulomb's constant and R is the distance from the center of the disk to the point where the potential is being measured.

2. How is the potential of a disk affected by changes in its charge?

The potential of a disk is directly proportional to its charge, meaning that as the charge increases, the potential also increases. This relationship is described by the equation V = kQ/R.

3. Can the potential of a disk be negative?

Yes, the potential of a disk can be negative. This occurs when the charge on the disk is negative, causing the potential to be negative as well.

4. What is the relationship between the radius of a disk and its potential?

The potential of a disk is inversely proportional to its radius, meaning that as the radius increases, the potential decreases. This relationship is described by the equation V = kQ/R.

5. How does the potential of a disk change as you move further away from it?

The potential of a disk decreases as you move further away from it, following an inverse square law. This means that the potential decreases as the inverse of the distance squared. For example, if you double the distance from the disk, the potential will decrease by a factor of four.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
367
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
350
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
64
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
164
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
898
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top