Potential versus potential energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the concept of "potential" in the context of electricity and magnetism, relating it to potential energy. It uses an analogy of buying apples at different prices to explain how potential functions similarly in electrostatics and gravitation. The potential is described as a location-dependent function that helps calculate potential energy, with electric potential related to charge and gravitational potential related to mass. The user expresses gratitude for the clarification, noting that the analogy helped solidify their understanding of electric potential. This explanation aims to assist others who may have similar confusion regarding the topic.
siifuthun
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I'm still a bit confused as to what "potential" referers to when we're talking about electricity and magenetism, and I'm not quite sure how it's related to potential energy if it is. If anyone can offer a bit of clarification or just a place that offers a good definition (b/c my book sure doesn't) I'd be grateful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is how I use to think of potential:

Say you're at home and decide to make an apple pie but you don't have any apples. It so happens there are lots of stores in your town that sell apples so you decide to look around. Store 1 sells apples for $.25 per apple. Store 2 sells apples for $.33 per apple. Say there are like 10 stores and each store sells apples for a different price per apple.

You are now wondering how much you need to spend to buy 10 apples. To do this, you must multiply 10 with the price per apple, depending on your location.

To simplify your calculation, you create a function of prices based on location. So price(store1)=.25, price(store2)=.33, etc. Therefore, knowing your location, all you need to do is multiply the number of apples you're buying and you know the total price. This price function is useful because it is independent of the number of apples you're buying.

Analogously, this price function is similar to what we call "potential" in electrostatics and gravitation. Instead of the total price of purchase, we have a potential energy. Instead of apples, we have electric charge or mass.

Electric PE = charge x electric potential
Gravitational PE = mass x gravitational potential
Total Price = apples x price-per-apple.

The potential is usually a function of location, and of course, you have equations that define what the magnitude of the potential is at a given position. (EDIT: sorry, I mixed some terms earlier)
 
Last edited:
:biggrin: Thank you for helping me sort that out in my head, I think I was onto the right idea but that I was just confused, this really clarified it for me.
 
Again, sorry to bump an old thread but Jelfish's post really helped me understand EP. I think it might help others if they see it, too.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top