Power factor correction with two loads

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating power factor correction for two loads with different power factors. The first load has a lagging power factor of 0.7, while the second load has a leading power factor of 0.95. To find the total capacitance needed for correction, one must first determine the reactive currents of both loads and assess whether the overall system is capacitive or inductive. If both loads require additional capacitance, they can be combined since they are in parallel; however, the leading power factor load may not need added capacitance. Understanding the phase relationship is crucial for achieving a zero power factor.
jean28
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://i1226.photobucket.com/albums/ee410/jean28x/8b1ad092d9dd25a8f10f1672c0073d97.jpg

Vs = 480<0 rms.
P1 105 W; pf1 0.7 lagging; P2 5 × 104 W; pf2 0.95 leading.

Homework Equations



S = sqrt(P^2 + Q^2), = Vrms* Irms(conjugate)

The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to calculate the capacitance with one load, but how do I work with the two loads? Do I find the capacitance of both and then add them up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jean28 said:

Homework Statement



http://i1226.photobucket.com/albums/ee410/jean28x/8b1ad092d9dd25a8f10f1672c0073d97.jpg

Vs = 480<0 rms.
P1 105 W; pf1 0.7 lagging; P2 5 × 104 W; pf2 0.95 leading.
Where did you get the detail that one is lagging and the other leading?
I know how to calculate the capacitance with one load, but how do I work with the two loads? Do I find the capacitance of both and then add them up?
If they both needed added capacitance, then because the loads are in parallel you can add the two capacitances. But if you are correct in saying one load has leading pf, then that load doesn't require added parallel capacitance.

First step: add the reactive currents of the two loads. Is it overall capacitive or inductive?
 
Power factor is an even function of the phase angle, meaning the phase itself can be either + or -, requiring different reactive components to bring the phase to zero. So you need to have this defined for you first.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
17K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
6K