Power from both fusion and fission?

AI Thread Summary
Power generation from fusion and fission is limited by the nuclear binding energy of elements, with both processes yielding net energy only up to iron. Fusion can occur with lighter elements like hydrogen, while fission can break down heavier elements but not all the way to hydrogen. The idea of continual energy gain through both processes is impractical, as they converge at iron and nickel, which have the highest binding energy. This means that once elements reach this point, no further energy can be extracted through either fusion or fission. Understanding these limitations is crucial for nuclear energy discussions.
Jonnyb42
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
I haven't thought about it TOO much, but it seems that you should only get power from either fusing atoms or splitting (fissing?) them, but how come both? Wouldn't that mean you could continually fuse and split atoms for continual energy gain?

(My currrent thought against that is, that you can fuse hydrogen to any element, but cannot split heaver elements all the way down to hydrogen.
That "continual" process would end in Iron or something like that?)
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Fusion will only result in net power output up to iron, and fission will only result in net power output down to about iron. This is because Iron and Nickel have the highest binding energy of all the elements.

See here for more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_binding_energy
 
I see, thanks.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...

Similar threads

Back
Top