Power(hp) needed for climbing an inclined plane

AI Thread Summary
To determine the horsepower required for a 1-ton tracked vehicle to climb a 40° hill at 10 kph, one must consider the physics of incline, including gravitational forces and friction. The discussion emphasizes the need for a practical understanding of power transfer efficiency from the engine to the treads. The user is building a 1:4 scale model of an M4 Sherman tank, weighing approximately 1000 lbs, and seeks to equip it with a gasoline engine. Calculating the exact power requirements involves more complexity than initially suggested, as various factors impact performance. Accurate assessments will ensure the model can effectively navigate the intended inclines.
James Chartrand
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
how much power(hp) would a 1-ton tracked vehicle need to climb 40° hills at 10kph. I know that this isn't exactly a physics question but I know that solving it involves physics to a certain extent.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is completely a physics question, but it is of a form where it is required, on this forum, that you make some effort on your own. What is your background? What is your need to figure this out? I assume you are implying that this is not a homework question.
 
I am sorry for my lack (no) of content in describing the need for this question- the reason for which it that I didn't have much time to post it- and error that I will rectify now. The reason that I posted this is because I am building a 1:4 recreation of an M4 Sherman tank- of course, it won't be nearly as heavy as the real thing- but still a formidable 1000 lb. I want to equip it with an internal combustion gasoline engine and I would like to know the power needed for it.
 
James Chartrand said:
I am sorry for my lack (no) of content in describing the need for this question- the reason for which it that I didn't have much time to post it- and error that I will rectify now. The reason that I posted this is because I am building a 1:4 recreation of an M4 Sherman tank- of course, it won't be nearly as heavy as the real thing- but still a formidable 1000 lb. I want to equip it with an internal combustion gasoline engine and I would like to know the power needed for it.
I think that's a lot more complicated that your fairly straight-forward question suggests. You'll have to take into account the efficiency of transfer of power from the engine to the treads at the very least.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top