Power required for muscles to hold object up

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pythagorean
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of muscle contraction and energy expenditure during isometric contractions, where muscles maintain tension without movement. It explores the analogy of a piston in a pressurized chamber to describe how muscles require a continuous supply of energy, specifically ATP, to maintain contraction. The conversation highlights that even when holding a weight statically, energy is consumed due to the biochemical processes involved in muscle function. The role of myosin and actin in muscle contraction is emphasized, with myosin hydrolyzing ATP to facilitate movement along actin filaments. The need for energy to sustain muscle tension, even in the absence of motion, is a key point, suggesting that muscle bonds may require energy to remain intact during isometric holds. Additional resources are provided for further understanding of muscle physiology and contraction types.
Pythagorean
Science Advisor
Messages
4,416
Reaction score
327
Is there a simple theory for this in terms of mechanics?

I'm not quite sure how to frame this. I guess you could look at it as a piston being held up by a pressurized chamber that has a constantly open release valve on it, but also an input valve that you have to keep supplying (to equal the release valves volume exhausted).

Do I have to go to the biology subforum now to find out if the bond holding my muscles together has to be supplied with energy (ATP, I presume) or the bonds would break and my arms would drop, much like if we stopped supplying the the pressurized chamber above?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I'm not quite sure what you are asking.

It takes perhaps 2500 calories daily of energy to power a typical human body...that includes exercise (work, as in force times distance) but the body also requires energy to maintain, repair and operate life functions...somebody must have typical data for such life maintenance functions..digestion, blood circulation, breathing, etc...

The issue you may be addressing is if one holds up, say, a one lb object the person will use more energy (calories) than if they were not holding such a weight. That's an incremental increase in energy and likely sports medicene or a related field would have observational data on such efforts over and above life functions.
 
Naty1 said:
I'm not quite sure what you are asking.

It takes perhaps 2500 calories daily of energy to power a typical human body...that includes exercise (work, as in force times distance) but the body also requires energy to maintain, repair and operate life functions...somebody must have typical data for such life maintenance functions..digestion, blood circulation, breathing, etc...

The issue you may be addressing is if one holds up, say, a one lb object the person will use more energy (calories) than if they were not holding such a weight. That's an incremental increase in energy and likely sports medicene or a related field would have observational data on such efforts over and above life functions.

Well, I posted this in the physics forum with the first paragraph in mind, but then kind of answered my question and had a second question in mind (second paragraph).

I'm more interested in the mechanism, not the numbers.

Like, if I'm holding a weight up, I'm obviously burning energy the whole time to do it, even though there's no motion. So what happens here? Are the bonds between the muscle cells temporary and must be supplied energy to keep bonded so that the muscle stays contracted?
 
Muscle contraction occurs via myosin and actin. Briefly, myosin hydrolyzes ATP in order to 'walk' along an actin filament.

Reality is a bit more complicated and this website is excellent:

http://people.eku.edu/ritchisong/301notes3.htm

You are asking about the physiology of an 'isometric' contraction

http://muscle.ucsd.edu/musIntro/contractions.shtml

None of the websites mentioned if isometric contractions are similar to stalling the myosin motor, but I think that's what happens:

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1366860
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Back
Top