Power to Horsepower Conversion: Multiply or Divide?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anonymous820
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To convert power to horsepower, one should divide the power in watts by 746, as 1 horsepower is equivalent to 746 watts. In the given example, the calculated power of 638.79 W results in approximately 0.856 hp when divided by 746. The discussion emphasizes the importance of unit conversion and estimation to verify the reasonableness of results. Participants agree that multiplying by 746 would yield an unreasonable horsepower value, reinforcing the correct approach of division. Mastering unit conversions is highlighted as a crucial skill in math and physics studies.
anonymous820
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



how do u get from power to horsepower?
mass=60 kg
weight=588.6 N
height=7 m
time=6.45 s
power= 638.79 W

Homework Equations



----

The Attempt at a Solution



multiply by 746 W to get: 476537.34 hp
or divide by 746 W to get: .856286 hp

i think its divide rather than multiply b/c then the watts cancel and ure left with hp, but I am not sure. that's my only question. multiply or divide?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1 horsepower = 745.7 watts
or 1 W = 1/745.7 Hp, so you replace the 'W' with (1/745.7)Hp.

Or just think would 638W be more or less than 1 hp and roughly how many would it be?
It's always worth estimating the answer before putting the numbers in a calculator.
 
Last edited:
less. so IT IS divide. thanks. i knew 400,000 hp was unreasonable for a person. this was a lab btw.
 
Last edited:
anonymous820 said:
i think its divide rather than multiply b/c then the watts cancel and ure left with hp, but I am not sure. that's my only question. multiply or divide?

You have the correct instinct that you should be able to carry your units along in your calculation to help you keep the numbers in the right places. Here's a thread that should help your insight -- check out my post #10 and the subsequent comments:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=130989

Very important trick to use and master in your math and physics and engineering studies!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top