Poynting theory apply to both static and time varying fields?

AI Thread Summary
The Poynting vector represents the flow of energy per unit area and is applicable to both static and time-varying electromagnetic fields. The Poynting theorem, derived from Maxwell's equations, confirms its validity in all scenarios, including steady currents as illustrated in Griffiths' Example 8.1. In this example, the power flow along a wire is calculated using the voltage across the wire and the current, demonstrating the theorem's practical application. Analyzing energy flow in a DC coaxial cable further exemplifies the Poynting vector's relevance in stationary problems. This discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding energy transport in electromagnetic systems.
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294
Poynting vector is flow of energy per unit area. Dose it apply for both static field where E and B are decoupled, AND time varying EM field where E and B are coupled?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reason I ask is referring to page 346-349 of Griffiths. The Poynting theorem was derived using time varying relation where

\nabla \times \vec B= \mu\vec J -\mu\frac {\partial \vec D}{\partial t} \;\hbox { and }\; \nabla \times \vec E=-\frac{\partial \vec B}{\partial t}

But then in Example 8.1 on page 348, it gave an example of a steady current I flow down a wire and calculate the power flow down the wire ( Poynting vector S). Where is use E= (voltage across wire) divided by the length of wire. B is calculated by current I.
 
The Poynting theorem follows from the complete Maxwell equations and thus is valid always.

E.g., it is interesting to calculate the energy flow of a DC conducting coaxial cable (I choose this as an example, because this is a very simple to solve stationary problem). Calculate both, the electric and magnetic fields and then the Poynting vector. Then think about, what this means concerning energy transport.
 
Thanks
What you suggested is very similar to problem 8.1 in Griffiths and I worked it out already.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top