Certainly an horrible way of thinking and that's why I should like to get a fundamental critic about this:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

As I can read in some threads, the Poynting’s vector is of a great importance (e.g.: to know if a radiation is present or not) in a lot of works and theories; in mine too. One of the biggest limitation in all discussions around this vector is the fact that it must be zero in any inertial frame and that we mainly stay in one frame of this kind.

I also have seen that one have to make a distinction between true and not really true physical parameter; i.e., true parameter are gauge independent. Is the Poynting’s vector gauge independent in the EM theory? [My answer to this question is yes if one can find a gauge for which the Schwarz’s condition of integrability holds along the time].

If yes, then it must be possible to associate an “observable” Ŝ to this Poynting's vector S and this observable should obey the usual law concerning an evolution along the time:

d< Ŝ >/dt = (i/hbar). <[H, Ŝ]> + <partial deriv. of Ŝ/along time>

Result: even in an inertial frame where obviously < Ŝ > = 0, one gets:

0 = (i/hbar). <[H, Ŝ]> + <partial deriv. of Ŝ/along time>

As one can demonstrate that (1/c²). partial deriv. of S/along time as the same physical units than a force per unit volume, if (1/c²). partial deriv. of Ŝ/along time can be understood as the equivalent of (1/c²). partial deriv. of S/along time in the language of the observables, then, even in inertial frames, one should have a relation like:

<partial deriv. of F/per unit of volume> equivalent to - (i/hbar.c²). <[H, Ŝ]>

What do you think of that? Is it the signature for the obligatory existence of forces that only vanish if the observable associated with the Poynting’s vector commutes with the Hamiltonian H of the system under consideration?

What are these forces? Logically, it should concern any system (set, collection) of EM waves. Also, it must concern a solely wave “travelling” in one of our laboratories and this would mean that this photon should “feel” or react to this force.

If all the demonstration made here is true (I have some doubts) then a solely photon could show a deviation each time that circumstances lead to <[H, Ŝ]> not equal to 0 in the laboratory. Has someone here a concrete example what are these circumstances looking like?

Thanks

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Poynting's vector - Observable - Force?

Loading...

Similar Threads for Poynting's vector Observable |
---|

I State Vectors vs. Wavefunctions |

I Operators and vectors in infinite dimensional vector spaces |

A Commutator vector product |

A Law of transformation of vectors due to rotations |

B What happens to virtual photons when an EMF is extinguished? |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**