Practical question- anyone w. experience w. BBO crystals?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around issues encountered when inserting BBO crystals into the optical path of a TiSapphire fs laser, specifically resulting in strong second harmonic generation (SHG) output but with significant distortion of the pulse shape. The output is described as having a line shape instead of the expected circular input, with a secondary intense component complicating optimization efforts. This distortion occurs consistently across two different crystals and laser systems, which is unusual compared to past experiences. There is speculation about potential surface defects on the crystals contributing to the problem, but lateral movement of the crystal does not resolve the issue. The participants express interest in further details and solutions to this optical challenge.
slap babies
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hi all-

having a strange (perhaps expected?) problem inserting a BBO into the optical path of a TiSaph fs laser.

the issue is that i can achieve strong SHG output, but only with *severe* spatial distortion of the pulse shape.

has anyone had experience/encountered this issue in an optics lab? if so i can go into more details.

tia

slaps
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've used BBO with Ti-Sapphire, and I've used cameras to characterize pulse shape. But I haven't specifically seen the wave front of a TiSaph pulse that went through a BBO.

Interested in the problem and more details though. I might have time to look it up.
 
well, i suspect its less of a 'physicsy' problem than one might hope.

generally, when things are working well the output SHG more or less matches the input pulse shape with some extra chirp and/or dispersion which can often be disregarded.

in our case, we see this 'good' output shape, but as you try and optimize the SHG signal, a second component is introduced which is 1-2 orders of magnitude more intense and is distorted into the shape of a line. thus, you have a circular input and a line output. moreover, if you proceed to optimize the output of this line-shaped SHG output, the crystal ends up at an extremely cockeyed angle.

to make matters worse, its happening w/ two separate crystals on two separate laser systems. in the past (two years) i don't recall this problem. I'm curious if there may be enhanced SHG off a surface defect, but the problem persists even if you move the crystal surface laterally.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top