Practice problem: Determining R using current divider method

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saeed.z
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a practice problem involving the current divider method to determine the resistance value of R_L. The original poster calculated R_L to be 8 ohms based on measured currents of 0.2 A through a 10-ohm resistor and 0.25 A through R_L, while the textbook states the correct answer is 24 ohms. Participants confirmed the calculation of 8 ohms is consistent with their own findings, suggesting a potential error in the textbook. They discussed the output voltage implications of using 8 ohms, which also aligns with their calculations. The conversation highlights confusion over the discrepancy between calculated and textbook values.
Saeed.z
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
Hi all ,

there is a practice problem in my textbook which say :

http://im17.gulfup.com/2012-02-14/1329248560881.jpg

i found after the load is attached that the current through 10 ohm's is 0.2 ampere and through R_L is 0.25 ampere, therefore , the value of R_L is 8 ohm's but the correct answer is 24 ohm's !

i checked again with the multism program and found my answer is correct !

i used the current divider method here .

so I'm a little confused ! which one is correct ?

BTW , sorry for my bad english :)

thanks

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Saeed.z said:
Hi all ,

there is a practice problem in my textbook which say :

http://im17.gulfup.com/2012-02-14/1329248560881.jpg

i found after the load is attached that the current through 10 ohm's is 0.2 ampere and through R_L is 0.25 ampere, therefore , the value of R_L is 8 ohm's but the correct answer is 24 ohm's !

i checked again with the multism program and found my answer is correct !

i used the current divider method here .

so I'm a little confused ! which one is correct ?

BTW , sorry for my bad english :)

thanks


The current drawn from the source power supply is greater when the Rl resistor is connected.

To figure this out, just write the equation for the output voltage with the known resistors 40 and 10 and the unknown Rl in parallel with the 10 Ohm resistor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I get 8 Ohms too.
 
DragonPetter said:
I get 8 Ohms too.

Interesting. I didn't even bother to figure out the answer, but you are right. Plugging in 8 Ohms for the load resistor does give 2V at the output. Hmm...
 
berkeman said:
Interesting. I didn't even bother to figure out the answer, but you are right. Plugging in 8 Ohms for the load resistor does give 2V at the output. Hmm...

I tried to figure out where they could get 24 ohms from, as if I misinterpreted the problem, but I didn't bother with spending the time and assume its an error in the answer book.
 
@berkeman
@DragonPetter
thank you all of you guys , i really appreciate your help !
thanks !
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...
Back
Top