Pre-Med Physics: Calc vs Non-Calc

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyberchicken
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Pre-med students are weighing the decision between taking a non-calculus physics course with a less favorable instructor or a calculus-based physics course with a highly regarded teacher. The consensus leans towards opting for the calculus-based course, especially if the student is comfortable with math, as a better instructor can significantly enhance understanding and retention of the material. This improved grasp of physics concepts may also benefit performance on the MCAT, which does not provide a formula sheet. Additionally, taking the calculus-based course could help the student stand out in medical school applications. However, it is crucial to confirm that the chosen course is accepted by the student's pre-med program, as requirements can vary. Some students have shared experiences where course formats, such as lab requirements, influenced their decisions, emphasizing the importance of understanding specific program prerequisites.
Cyberchicken
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm a pre-med student currently registering for classes for the next semester and physics is next up for me on the requirements. I want some insight as to whether it's a good idea to take the non-calc, pre-med physics with a teacher they say is "eh", or to take the calc based, physics major course with a teacher who is supposedly great.

I will have finished calc II by the end of this semester and I like math, so the calc part is not a problem. I just want to know if it's worth it to learn the extra material which is unnecessary for the MCAT in order to have a better teacher.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take the calc-based if you're good with the math. I think it's easier to understand the material when the teacher can use the words "derivative" and "integral" instead of waving their hands and pulling formulae out of their rectal cavities.
 
It's worth it. If you know calculus, then go for the better teacher.

One's first physics teacher can make a huge impression on what they learn and how they view the subject, at least in my opinion.
 
I'll concur with the above two recommendations. If you have the grasp of calculus and think you can perform as well (or better because of the better professor) in the calc-based course, take the calc-based course. It will hopefully make your understanding better (which may in turn make problems easier on the MCAT... since that test apparently doesn't give you a formula sheet). In addition, it might make you stand out a bit among other med-school applicants.

Do, however, make sure that your "pre-med major" accepts the course. I make the above recommendation based on my sister's experience, before such majors existed. She majored in chemistry and biology, took the calculus-based physics sequence, and successfully applied for and completed an MD/PhD (which is a great financial route if you have the interest and ability).
 
physics girl phd said:
Do, however, make sure that your "pre-med major" accepts the course.

Great suggestion. When I took general physics 1 at the community college, the calc-based version was a non-lab class, and the non-calc one was a lab, so one particular certificate program required the non-calc class with the lab.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top