Pre-parachute air friction equal to post-parachute?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DocZaius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the forces acting on a skydiver before and after opening a parachute. Initially, the force of gravity (Fg) pulls the skydiver down while the force of air friction (Ff) increases until terminal velocity is reached, where Ff equals -Fg. Upon opening the parachute, Ff temporarily exceeds Fg, causing the skydiver to decelerate until a new terminal velocity is achieved, where Ff again equals -Fg. The key realization is that although more air molecules impact the parachute, they do so at a lower speed, resulting in an equivalent total force of air friction compared to the pre-parachute scenario. This understanding clarifies the misconception that air friction increases significantly after the parachute is deployed.
DocZaius
Messages
365
Reaction score
11
I was thinking of the free body diagram of a skydiver and came across something which bothered me.

Fg = Force of gravity
Ff = Force of air friction

1. The skydiver jumps out. Fg (constant) pulls down and Ff increases until terminal velocity is reached. At that point, the skydiver is falling at a constant speed and Ff = -Fg

2. The skydiver opens his parachute. Momentarily, Ff is greater in magnitude than Fg and the skydiver accelerates upwards, losing some of his falling speed until a new terminal velocity is reached.

3. The skydiver is now falling at a constant speed but with a different profile. But since he's falling at a constant speed, Ff = -Fg.

Since Fg is constant, that means step 1 and step 3's Ff's are identical. But why is the force of air friction not higher with the parachute open?

I am sure I am missing some stupid obvious thing.

edited to add: I think I figured it out. After the parachute has opened, even though there are more air molecules hitting the skydiver and parachute, they are doing so at a smaller speed, thus exerting the same total force as pre-parachute. I had erroneously gone through life thinking air friction post-chute-opening was greater. By the way, please let me know if this explanation is correct. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got it.

If we model the frictional force as:
f=c_{f}v^{2} with c_{f} being the coefficient of friction, v the velocity, then in the latter case, its c_f is greater than in the first.

This can be translated into your language that a higher number of molecules hits the open parachute, but at a lower speed.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top