I think you're close, but that's not quite right. Since you've clearly given it a number of attempts let me run through it for you. Let me know if you have any questions:
CASE 1: X > 0
As you know, our original inequality is actually two separate ones:
i) 1/X ≤ 1
ii) -3 < 1/X
To solve (i), I'm going to multiply both sides by X. Since X is positive, I don't have to flip any signs, and I end up with:
X ≥ 1
To solve (ii), I'm going to multiply both sides by X:
-3X < 1
then I'm going to divide both sides by -3, which requires a sign flip, since -3 is negative:
X > -1/3
Since the above inequality is satisfied by ANY X > 0, this result doesn't actually provide any useful constraint. So the result is:
Solution for CASE 1: X ≥ 1
CASE 2: X < 0
To solve inequality (i) for X, we have to multiply both sides by X, which requires a sign flip since X is negative:
X ≤ 1
Since this result is satisfied by ANY X < 0, it does not provide a useful constraint. Solving inequality (ii), we have to first multiply both sides by X, and then divide both sides by -3. Since we multiply by TWO negative numbers, we have to flip the inequality sign twice, which is the same as not flipping it at all:
X < -1/3
Solution for CASE 2: X < -1/3
The final solution is therefore the union of the solutions for the two cases:
X ≥ 1 OR X < -1/3