Precession angle per orbit of perhelion precession mercury

fakrudeen
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Many derivations of mercury precession angle per orbit \Delta\Phi, equate this to extra angle per orbit \delta in excess of 2\pi

that is \delta = \Delta\Phi

But I am getting this relation

\sqrt{4\pi\delta}= \Delta\Phi

from arc length of helix and circular orbit.
What am I doing wrong?
What is the intution for above approximation? Shouldn't the total angle be less than 2\pi + \Delta\Phi
because planet takes short cut [analagous to hypotenuse length being less than sum of other two sides]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was trying to approximate perihelion precession as helix and its arc length.

It turns out the approximation used is simple angular velocity addition

if angular velocity about ecliptic is w0 and angular velocity of precession is w1,
then their vector sum is the real angular velocity
\omega= \omega0 + \omega1

now in one period T, \omega0 contributes 2\Pi because it is the motion in ecliptic and \omega1's contribution is precession per orbit by definition which adds up to angle contributed by real motion.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
70
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top