Precession angle per orbit of perhelion precession mercury

fakrudeen
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Many derivations of mercury precession angle per orbit \Delta\Phi, equate this to extra angle per orbit \delta in excess of 2\pi

that is \delta = \Delta\Phi

But I am getting this relation

\sqrt{4\pi\delta}= \Delta\Phi

from arc length of helix and circular orbit.
What am I doing wrong?
What is the intution for above approximation? Shouldn't the total angle be less than 2\pi + \Delta\Phi
because planet takes short cut [analagous to hypotenuse length being less than sum of other two sides]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was trying to approximate perihelion precession as helix and its arc length.

It turns out the approximation used is simple angular velocity addition

if angular velocity about ecliptic is w0 and angular velocity of precession is w1,
then their vector sum is the real angular velocity
\omega= \omega0 + \omega1

now in one period T, \omega0 contributes 2\Pi because it is the motion in ecliptic and \omega1's contribution is precession per orbit by definition which adds up to angle contributed by real motion.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
70
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top