Precession angle per orbit of perhelion precession mercury

fakrudeen
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Many derivations of mercury precession angle per orbit \Delta\Phi, equate this to extra angle per orbit \delta in excess of 2\pi

that is \delta = \Delta\Phi

But I am getting this relation

\sqrt{4\pi\delta}= \Delta\Phi

from arc length of helix and circular orbit.
What am I doing wrong?
What is the intution for above approximation? Shouldn't the total angle be less than 2\pi + \Delta\Phi
because planet takes short cut [analagous to hypotenuse length being less than sum of other two sides]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was trying to approximate perihelion precession as helix and its arc length.

It turns out the approximation used is simple angular velocity addition

if angular velocity about ecliptic is w0 and angular velocity of precession is w1,
then their vector sum is the real angular velocity
\omega= \omega0 + \omega1

now in one period T, \omega0 contributes 2\Pi because it is the motion in ecliptic and \omega1's contribution is precession per orbit by definition which adds up to angle contributed by real motion.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
70
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top