Predicting Momentum Change in Elastic Collisions

  • Thread starter Thread starter kidsasd987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Momentum
AI Thread Summary
In elastic collisions, the initial momentum of two particles can be used to approximate their velocities after the collision, even without directly observing them. It is noted that larger mass particles typically experience less change in velocity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of the center of mass (c.m.) coordinate system, where the total momentum remains zero before and after the collision. The outcome in lab coordinates is influenced by the scattering angle. The primary concern remains whether any energy is lost during the collision.
kidsasd987
Messages
142
Reaction score
4
If we know the initial momentum of particles a and b (mass a and b, initial velocity of a and b),
is it possible knowing the momentum after the collision without observing the velocity of two particles?
(well there is two variables therefore it seems impossible but we know that generally larger mass does not change its velocity much.)We assume the collision is perfectly elastic. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm I think it is possible to 'approximate' the velocity after collision. if we assume some conditions such as contact time during the collision.
 
In the center of mass coordinate system, the particle momenta add up to 0. The main question is whether there is any energy loss.

In the case of elastic collision, in the c.m. coordinates, each particle will have the same momentum before and after. In lab coordinates, it will depend on the angle of scattering.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top